摘要
《鲁诗》出自荀子,但从荀子的学术师承来看,荀子不可能是子夏学派的传人,因而不可能传授出自子夏学派的《毛诗》;荀子被纳入《毛诗》的传承体系是一个晚起的说法,此说内在的矛盾使《毛诗》出自荀子的说法缺乏必要的依据;荀子引《诗》所依据的文本与《毛诗》存在着较大的差异,因此,《毛诗》的传授与荀子并无关联。荀子不尚空谈、学用合一的治学态度,使最初附属于乐的《诗》,最终演变成为礼的附庸。在汉代初年文化重建的过程中,《诗》重新回归到了王官之学的位置上,成为汉代经学政治重要的组成部分。
Even the fact that Lu-Shi has been imparted by XUN Zi is no doubt, but the opinion that Mao-shi was also imparted by him is suspecious. It has no relation between the impartation of Mao-shi and XUN Zi. On the base of these viewpoints, the author makes a further study and points out that, the way of his academic studies about mixing learning with its use, but no upholding hollow words, changed the role of the Book of Songs from the auxiliary of Music into the auxiliary of Rites. In the process of cultural reconstruction, the Book of Songs becomes the royal leanings again, and plays an important role in the Classic Politics of the Han-Imperial-Court.
出处
《清华大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第3期24-30,共7页
Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"周秦时代<诗>的传播史"(05CZW008)
