期刊文献+

化疗配合加速分割放疗治疗Ⅲ和Ⅳ A期鼻咽癌的临床观察

Chemotherapy combined with accelerated fractionated radiotherapy on stage Ⅲ and ⅣA nasopharyngeal carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比观察诱导化疗和后程同步化疗配合加速分割放疗治疗Ⅲ和ⅣA期鼻咽癌的疗效。方法:72例Ⅲ和ⅣA期鼻咽癌患者分成诱导化疗配合加速分割放疗组(36例,A组)和后程同步化疗配合加速分割放疗组(36例,B组)两组;均采用每周照射6d,每天1次,每次1.8~1.9Gy的加速分割放疗方法,A组在放疗前用PF方案化疗,B组放疗至36~38Gy缩野后加用PF方案同步化疗。结果:A组和B组鼻咽肿块控制率分别为91.7%(33/36)和94.4%(34/36),P=0.64;颈部肿块控制率分别为81.3%(26/32)和77.4%(24/31),P=0.71;颈淋巴结完全消退时剂量分别为(44.78±11.79)和(50.03±13.03)Gy,P=0.14。A组和B组鼻咽肿块CR率分别为80.6%(29/36)和83.3%(30/36),P=0.76;1年远处转移发生率分别为16.7%(6/36)和13.9%(5/36),P=0.74,1年生存率分别为94.4%(34/36)和91.7%(33/36),P=0.64。结论:诱导和后程同步化疗配合加速分割放疗对Ⅲ和ⅣA期鼻咽癌均获得较好的局部控制率,但两者的疗效无差异,急性毒副反应相当,能耐受,其长期疗效及后期不良反应有待进一步随访观察。 OBJECTⅣE: To compare neoadjvant chemotherapy combined with accelerated fractionated radiotherapy (AFR)and late course concurrent chemotherapy with AFR on stage In and Ⅳ A Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: 72 patients with stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ A NPC were randomized into two groups: neoadjvant chemotherapy combined with AFR group (group A) 36 patients, late course concurrent chemotherapy with AFR group (group B) 36 patients. Two groups also received 6 fraction per week, one time per day, 1.8- 1.9 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 72-79.8 Gy. What to different is that group A was treated by PF schemes before irradiation ,and group B was treated by concurrent chemotherapy followed by AFR to a dose 36-38 Gy. RESULTS: When radiotherapy was completed, the control rates of the tumor of nasopharynx of group A and B were 91.7%(33/36) and 94.4%(34/36) (P: 0.64), the tumor of neck were 81.3% (26/32) and 77.4%(24/31) (P:0.71) respectively. The dose of complete remission of group A and B were 44.78± 11.79, 50. 03± 13.03 Gy (P:0.14), the complete remission CR of nasopharyngeal tumor were 80.6%(29/36) and 83.3%(30/36) (P:0.76), and the 1-year survival rate were 94.4%(34/36), 91.7%(33/36) (P: 0.64) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that neoadjvant chemotherapy and late course concurrent chemotherapy combined with AFR can also improve local control rate on stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ A NPC, but there is no difference in latest curative effect. The long- term survival rate and the late complication need follow up.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 2008年第8期612-614,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 鼻咽肿瘤/药物疗法 鼻咽肿瘤/放射疗法 治疗效果 nasopharyngeal neoplasms/chemotherapy nasopharyngeal neoplasms/radiotherapy treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献30

  • 1刘泰福,徐国镇.全国鼻咽癌会议纪要[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,1992,0(4):5-10. 被引量:132
  • 2Teo P M,Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1999年,432卷,261页
  • 3Ma J,Chin J Cancer,1998年,18卷,增,44页
  • 4Min H,Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1994年,305卷,1037页
  • 5Zhang E P,Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1989年,162卷,301页
  • 6潘启超,肿瘤药理学与化学治疗学(第2版),2000年,518页
  • 7Hong S,Int Ridiat Oncol Biol Phys,1999年,45卷,4期,901页
  • 8Geara F B, Glisson B S, Sanuineti G, et al. Induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Cancer,1997, 79(7) :1279-1286.
  • 9Hong S, Wu H, Chie E K, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy compared with radiation therapy alone in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1999, 45(4):901-905.
  • 10ChuaDTT, ShamJST, AuGKH, et al. Concomitantchem oirradiation for stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Chinese patients: results of a matched cohort analysis[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2002, 53(2) : 334-343.

共引文献208

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部