期刊文献+

WOW培养法的研究 被引量:2

The Study of WOW Culturing Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 WOW培养法是目前培养胚胎的重要方法之一,在去透明带胚胎的培养上尤为重要。将拣卵针烧制成圆球状,在四孔板底烫制WOW,将不同时间去除透明带的牛孤雌激活胚培养于WOW中。结果显示:各组的卵裂率(78.9%、81.1%和78.9%)与对照组无显著差异(P>0.05);移入6-DMAP中之前去除组的囊胚率(31.5%)与移入培养液中之前去除组(32.4%)无显著差异(P>0.05),而且分别与对照组无差异显著(P>0.05);移入离子霉素中之前去除组未得到囊胚。移入6-DMAP中之前去除组囊胚细胞数(113.8±10.1)与移入培养液中之前去除组囊胚细胞数(112.5±8.1)和对照组均无显著差异(P>0.05)。分别5枚、15枚和30枚为一组进行培养,对胚胎的后续发育无显著影响。 WOW is one of the important methods for embryos culture, especially for zona-free embryos in vitro. In this study, glass needle was used to make WOW at the bottom of the four-well dish, and bovine zona-free parthenogenic activated embryos were cultured in the WOW. The results showed that cleavage rate of the three groups (78.9%, 81.1% and 78.9%) had no significant difference with control (P〉0.05). The blastocyst rate of the group of zona being digested before putting in 6-DMAP (31.5%) had no significant difference with the group of zona being digested before putting in SOFaa (P〉0.05), and the two groups had no significant difference with control (P〉0.05). The group of zona being digested before putting in ionomycin didn’t develop to blastocyst. The number of cells had no significant difference between the group of zona being digested before putting in 6-DMAP and the group of zona being digested before putting in SOFaa, and have no significant difference with control (P〉 0.05). Culturing embryos with different numbers in each group (5, 15, 30), there is no different on the development of embryos.
出处 《细胞生物学杂志》 CSCD 2008年第2期206-210,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cell Biology
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)资助项目(No.2001AA213081)~~
关键词 无透明带 孤雌激活 WOW培养法 bovine zona-free parthenogenic activation WOW
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1张秘生等.生物化学与生物物理进展,2002,29:881-881.
  • 2Vajta G et al. Biol Reprod, 2003, 68:571.
  • 3Naito K et al. Hum Reprod, 1992, 7:281.
  • 4Oback B et al. Cloning Stem Cells, 2003, 5:3.
  • 5Vajta G et al. Theriogenology, 2004, 62:1465.
  • 6Tecirlioglu RT et al. Reprod Fertil Dev, 2004, 15:361.
  • 7Hall VJ et al. Theriogenology, 2006, 65:424.
  • 8Galli C et al. Nature, 2003, 42.4:635.
  • 9Lagutina I et al. Reproduction, 2005, 130:559.
  • 10Ribas R et al. Cloning Stem Cells, 2005, 7:126.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Gabor Vajta, Ian M Lewis, Poul Hyttel,et al. Somatic cell cloning without micromanipulators[J]. Cloning, 2001, 3(2): 89-95.
  • 2P J Booth, S J Tan, R Reipurth, et al. Simplification of bovinesomatic cell nuclear transfer by application of a zona-free manipulationtechnique[J]. Cloning and Stem Cells, 2001, 3(3):139-150.
  • 3P J Booth,S J Tan, P Holm,et al. Aplication of the zona-free manipulation technique to porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer [J]. Cloning and Stem Cells, 2001, 3(4):191-197.
  • 4Gabor Vajta, Ian M Lewis, Alan O Trounson, et al. Handmade somatic cell cloning in cattle: Analysis of factors contributing tohigh efficiency in vitro[J]. Biology of Reproduction,2003, 68:571-578.
  • 5Paul J Booth, Dorthe Viuff, Shijian Tan, et al. Numerical Chromosome Error in Day 7 somatic Nuclear Transfer Bovine Blastocysts[J]. Biology of Reproduction, 2003, 68(3): 922-928.
  • 6Jonathan Hill, Quint Winger, Karen Jones, et al. The effect of donor cell serum starvation and oocyte activation compounds on the development of somatic cell cloned embryos[J]. Cloning, 2000, 1 (4) : 201-208.
  • 7Jonathan R Hill, Robert C Burghardt, Karen Jones, et al.Evidence for placental abnormality as the major cause of mortality in first-trimester somatic cell cloned bovine fetuses[J]. Biology of Reproduction, 2000, 63:1787-1794.
  • 8Andras Dinnyes, Yuji Hirao, Takashi Naga. Parthenogenetic activation of porcine oocytes by electric pulse and/or butyrolatoneI treatment[J]. Cloning,1999/2000,1 (4): 209-216.
  • 9G Vajta, P Holm,T Greve,et al.Overall efficiency of in vitro embryo production and vitrification in cattle[J]. Theriogenology,1996,45:683-689.
  • 10P Holm, P J Booth, M H Schmidt,et al. High bovine blastocystdevelopment in a static in vitro production system using SOFaa medium supplemented with sodium citrate and myo-inositol with or without serum-proteins[J]. Theriogenology, 1999,52:683-700.

共引文献3

同被引文献42

  • 1黄吴键,袁进,邓星,安靓.KSOM培养基营养成分调整对小鼠植入前期胚体外发育的影响[J].第一军医大学学报,2005,25(3):256-261. 被引量:6
  • 2高淑敏,温晓辉,邸科前,魏巍,李相运.小鼠附植前胚胎培养基的优化[J].西北农业学报,2006,15(4):6-9. 被引量:1
  • 3郭海英,季高峰,武建中,唐业刚,李跃民.水牛卵母细胞孤雌激活及孤雌胚与体外受精胚发育比较[J].浙江畜牧兽医,2007,32(4):6-8. 被引量:1
  • 4Booth P.J., Tan S.J., Reipurth R., H olm P., and Callesen H., 2001, Simplification of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer by application of a zona-free manipulation technique, Cloning and Stem Cells, 3:139-150.
  • 5Chatot C.L., Ziomek C.A., Bavister B.D., Lewis J.L., and Torres I., 1989, An improved culture medium supports development of random-bred 1-cell mouse embryos in vitro, Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 86, 679-688.
  • 6Chung Y.G., Mann Mellissa R.W., Bartolomei M.S., and Latham K.E., 2002, Nuclear-cytoplasmic "Tug of War" during cloning: Effects of somatic cell nuclei on culture medium preferences ofpreimplantation cloned mouse embryos, Biology of Reproduction, 66:1178-1184.
  • 7Erbach G.T., Lawitts J.A., Papaioannou V.E., and Biggers G.D., 1994, Differential growth of the mouse preimplantation embryo in chemically defined media, Biology of Reproduction, 50, 1027-1033.
  • 8Fischer B., and Bavister B.D., 1993, Oxygen tension in the oviduct and uterus of rhesus monkeys, hamsters and rabbits, Journals of Reproduction and Fertility, 99:673-679.
  • 9Hoelker M., Rings F., Ghanem N., Phatsara C., Griese J., Schellander K., and Tesfaye D., 2009, Effect of the microenvironment and embryo density on developmental characteristics and gene expression profile of bovine preimplantative embryos cultured in vitro, Reproduction, 137:415-425.
  • 10Im G.S., Lai L.X., Liu Z.H., Hao Y.H., Wax D., Bonk A., and Prather R.S., 2004, In vitro development of preimplantation porcine nuclear transfer embryos cultured in different media and gas atmospheres, Theriogenology, 61:1125-1135.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部