期刊文献+

西方国家政府绩效评估的新趋势 被引量:14

The New Tendency of Government Performance Assessment in Western Countries
原文传递
导出
摘要 20世纪90年代以来,西方国家政府绩效评估出现了新的发展趋势:政府绩效评估重心由"效率优先"走向"效能优先";政府绩效评估主体日益多元化;政府绩效评估方法日趋科学化;政府绩效评估逐步走向法制化。对这些趋势进行研究,对我们把握世界各国政府改革的未来走向,提高中国政府的绩效,有着重要的理论和实践意义。 Since the 1990s, government performance assessment has initiated a new developing trend in western countries. The focus of the government performance assessment is transformed from “the efficiency first” to “the potency first” : the subjects of the government performance assessment has more and more multiplied; the methods are scientific day by day; the government performance assessment moves toward the legalization gradually. The research on these tendencies have important theoretical and the practical significance on grasping the future trend of government reforms in western countries and enhancing the performance of Chinese government.
作者 秦国民
出处 《中国行政管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期102-104,共3页 Chinese Public Administration
关键词 西方国家 政府绩效 评估 western countries, government performance assessment, the new tendency
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[美]罗伯特·A·达尔.公共行政科学:三个问题[A].彭和平,竹立家等.国外公共行政理论精选[C].中共中央党校出版,1997.151.
  • 2[美]伍德罗·威尔逊.行政学研究[A].彭和平,竹立家等.国外会共行政理论精选[C].北京:中共中央党校出版社,1997.
  • 3张成福.公共行政的管理主义:反思与批判[J].中国人民大学学报,2001,(1).
  • 4Robert B. Denhardt & Janet Vinzant Denhardt, The New Public Service : Serving Rather than Steering, Public Administration Review, 2000,60 (6) :549 - 559.
  • 5[美]凯瑟琳·纽科默等.迎接业绩导向型政府的挑战[M].中山大学出版社,2003.123.
  • 6马克.霍哲(Marc Holzer),张梦中.公共部门业绩评估与改善[J].中国行政管理,2000(3):36-40. 被引量:130
  • 7[美]帕特里夏·基利,史蒂文·梅德林,休·麦克布赖德等.公共部门标杆管理[M].张定淮译.中国人民大学出版社,2002.35-36.

二级参考文献37

  • 1Colwell, W. L.&. Koletar, J. W. (1984).:Performance Measurement for Criminal Justice: The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Experience" Public Productivity Review Ⅷ(3):pp. 207-224.
  • 2Conference Proceedings of the 1993 Managing for Results: Performance Measures in Government.Auston, Texas, October 27-29.
  • 3Epstein, Paul D. (1992). "Measuring the Performance of Public Service," in M. Holzer (ed.), Public Productivity Handbook. Marcel Dekker:NY, (pp.161-194).
  • 4Epstein, Paul D. Using Performance Measurement in Local Government:A Guide to Improving Decisions, Performance and Accountability. National Civic League Press, 1988.
  • 5Fischer, R.J. (1994). "An Overview of Performance Measurement." Public Management 76:pp.S2-S8.
  • 6Glover, Mark. (1992). A Practical Guide for Measuring Program Eiiiciency and Effectiveness inLocal Government. Tampa, FL: Innovation Group Publication .
  • 7Government accounting Standards Board, Service Effort and Accomplishment Measuers. 1997.Norwalk, CT.
  • 8Government Performance Results Act of 1993. Washington, D.C. :Government Printing Office. 1993.
  • 9Halachmi, Arie, and Marc Holzer, eds. "Produetivity Measurement and Management. " (Public Prgductivity Review, 44) San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass,1987.
  • 10Harvey, J. (1987)."Measuring Productivity in Professional Services." Public Productivity Review (44) :pp. 29-38.

共引文献231

同被引文献109

引证文献14

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部