摘要
通过文献的比较,可知1931年中华书局刊本《正教真诠》实际上完全来自于同治三年(1864年)马如龙刊本《真诠要录》。因此,不能把中华书局刊本看作是《正教真诠》的独立版本。嘉庆六年(1801年)广州清真堂刊本《正教真诠》中的批语出自作序的明末伊斯兰教学者梁以濬;而《真诠要录》中的批语虽然由之而来,却已有很大的不同。《真诠要录》的内容也偶有超出《正教真诠》的地方。
Through literature comparison, we would find that the edition of Zhengjiao Zhenquan printed in 1931 by Zhonghua Press was from Zhenquan Yaolu printed in i864 by Ma Rulong. Zhenquan Yaolu is an extract of Zhenjiao Zhenquan, so we shouldn＇ t take it as a new independent edition of Zhengjiao Zhenquan. There are some important differences between Zhenquan Yaolu and Zhengjiao Zhenquan, such as annotations written by Liang Yijun in the margins. Occasionally, some content of Zhengquan Yaolu went beyond Zhengjiao Zhenauan.
出处
《西北第二民族学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2008年第3期36-40,共5页
Journal of The Second Northwest Institute For Ethnic Minorities(Philosophy and Social Science)
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目"早期汉文伊斯兰教文献研究"(05JC730006)
