期刊文献+

黄土丘陵沟壑区不同时空尺度下产沙模数的变化

Sediment Yield of a Loess Hill Area at Different Temporal and Spatial Scales
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在陕北岔巴沟流域,依据不同的时间尺度,挑选了1964年及1966年中能覆盖整个岔巴沟流域的9场降雨(次降雨尺度),包括着9次降雨的6个月份(月尺度)以及1964、1965、1966和1967连续4年(年尺度)的侵蚀产沙数据。分别在峁坡、全坡面、毛沟、支沟、干沟等不同空间尺度下,考虑次暴雨、月、年等不同时间尺度的侵蚀产沙情况。分析结果表明:坡面尺度与支沟、干沟尺度的侵蚀产沙方式有所不同,后者年际产沙模数变幅比较小(年际间产沙模数差异系数为0.42);在同一时间尺度下,产沙模数的大小,由时间不同造成的差异大于由空间不同造成的差异。在小的时间尺度,产沙模数大小变化比较随机;在大的时间尺度,产沙模数呈现一定尺度效应。相同面积区域不同时间的产沙模数差异系数分别为:不同次暴雨之间最大(1.05),不同月份之间次之(0.835),而不同年份之间最小(0.76)。本文将侵蚀产沙的能量分为质与量两个方面,分别讨论了坡面尺度与流域尺度能量变化与侵蚀产沙的关系。 Hydrological data including precipitation, runoff, and sediment Chabagou catchment in northern Shaanxi province for different time scale from 9 single rainfall events, a 6-month period, and a 4-year period sediment yield were also analyzed at several spatial scales ranging from yield were collected from the Data included measurements 1964- 1967). Erosion and llslope to watershed. Results showed that the process of erosion and sediment yield at a hillslope scale was different from the channel or gully scale, which had a smaller range of variation in annual erosion and sediment yield. For a single time scale, variation in sediment yield among different periods was greater than the variation among different spatial scales. The sediment yield was highly variable at small temporal scales, so changes in temporal scale had more influence on the measurement of sediment yield than changes in spatial scale. For longer time scales, the use of more data points had a smoothing effect on trends. At an annual time scale, sediment yield measurements first increased and then decreased with increasing spatial scale. Erosion processes differed based on spatial scale. Sediment yield from interrills was mainly produced during single rainfall events. Mass movement and gully erosion were very serious in channels, which was apparent during low-flow periods. The variance coefficients of sediment yield measurements collected from different time scales at the same spatial scale varied significantly: the most considerable difference was between single rainfall events (1.05), while the variance coefficient at a scale of months was more modest (0.835) and for different years was minimal (0.76). The energy of erosion and sediment yield was discussed in terms of quantity and quality to describe the relationship of changes in energy and sediment yield at the hillslope and watershed scales.
出处 《资源科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期717-724,共8页 Resources Science
基金 国家基金委员会重点基金项目(编号:40635027) 国家重点基础研究发展计划973项目(编号:2007CB407207) 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所自然科学基金延伸支持领域前沿项目(编号:CXIOG-A04-10)
关键词 时间尺度 空间尺度 侵蚀产沙 黄土丘陵沟壑区 Time scale Spatial scale Erosion and sediment yield Gullies Hilly area of loess plateau
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Favis-Mortlock D T, Quinton J N, Dickinson W T. The GCTE validation of soil erosion models for global change studies [ J ]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1996,51 (5) : 397 - 403.
  • 2Kirkby M J, Cox N J. A climate index for soil erosion potential(CSEP), Including seasonal factors[J]. Catena, 1995,25:333 - 352.
  • 3Kirkby M J, lmeson A C, Berkamp G, et al. Scaling up processes and models from the field plot to the watershed and regional areas [ J ]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1996,54(3) :391 - 396.
  • 4Boardman J, Favis-Mortlock D T. Modelling soil erosion by water: some conclusions [ A ]. Modeling Soil Erosion by Water [C]. NATOASI Series, Springer, 1998.
  • 5Kirby M J, Mcmahon M L. MEDRUSIf and the Catsop basin the lessons leamed[J]. Catena, 1999,37:495 - 506.
  • 6袁再健,蔡强国,褚英敏.四川紫色土地区流域侵蚀产沙空间的尺度效应初探[J].资源科学,2007,29(1):160-164. 被引量:5
  • 7刘前进,蔡强国,刘纪根,吕国安,张光远.黄土丘陵沟壑区土壤侵蚀模型的尺度转换[J].资源科学,2004,26(z1):81-90. 被引量:8
  • 8Walling D E. The sediment delivery problem [J]. Journal Hydrology, 1983,65( 1 -3) : 209-237.
  • 9Owens P, Slaymaker O. Late Holocene Sediment Yields in Small Alpine and Subalpine Drainage Basins[ M ]. British Columbia, ASH Publications, 1992.
  • 10Church M, Slaymaker O. Disequilibrium of holocene sediment yield in glaciated british columbia[J]. Nature, 1989, 337(6206): 452-454.

二级参考文献47

  • 1徐建华,李雪梅,张培德,林银平.黄河粗泥沙界限与中游多沙粗沙区区域研究[J].泥沙研究,1998,23(4):36-46. 被引量:14
  • 2张信宝,安芷生.黄土高原地区森林与黄土厚度的关系[J].水土保持通报,1994,14(6):1-4. 被引量:32
  • 3[8]L.T. Trana, M.A. Ridgleyb, L. Ducksteinc, et al. Application of fuzzy logic-based modeling to improve the performance of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation[J]. Catena ,2002,47:203 ~ 226.
  • 4[17]Baffaut. C, Nearing, MA, Covers. G. Statistical distributions of soil loss from runoff plots and WEPP model simulations [ J ]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1998, 62: 756~763.
  • 5[18]Willisms,J. M. Nearing, A. Nicks, et al. Using soil erosion models for global change studies[J]. Soil and Water Conservation, 1996, 51 (5): 381 ~ 385.
  • 6[25]Kirkby, MJ, AC Imeson,G. Bergkamp. Scalingup processes and models from the field plot to the watershed and regional areas[J]. Soiland Water Conservation, 1996,51(5) :391 ~ 396.
  • 7[26]Hua Lu, Gallant, J.G., Prosser, I.P., etsl. Prediction of Sheet and Rill Erosion Over the Australian Continant, Incorporating Monthly Soil Loss Distribution[ M]. 2001. CSIRO Land and Water Technical Report[C]. http ://www. clw. csiro, au/publications/technical2001/tr13-01.pdlf, 2004- 04- 15.
  • 8[27]S.M. de Jong, M.L. Paracchini, F. Bertolo S. Folving, et al. Regional assessment of soil erosion using the distribution model SEMMED and remotely sensed data[J]. Catena, 1999,37:291 ~ 308.
  • 9[28]R.E. Braziera J. S. Rowan, S. G. Anthony, et al. "MIRSED" towards an MIR approach to modeling hillslope soil erosion at the national scale [J]. Catena, 2001,42 (1):59~79.
  • 10[30]Victor Jetten, Ad de Ron, David Favis-Mortlock. Evaluation of field-scale and catchment-scale soil erosion models[J]. Catena, 1999,37:521 ~ 541.

共引文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部