期刊文献+

Carisolv微创技术治疗乳牙龋病的临床研究

Clinical evaluation of carisolv for the chemomechanical removal of dental caries in primary teeth
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价Carisolv微创技术用于乳牙龋病治疗的临床疗效。方法:选择年龄4~10岁、有对称的乳牙中龋或深龋的64例患儿,采用自身半口对照,分别用Carisolv微创去腐和常规球钻去腐并玻璃离子充填,比较临床治疗效果。结果:Carisolv去腐时疼痛明显轻于球钻去腐(P<0.01),97%的患儿认为Carisolv凝胶的味道可接受,多数患儿倾向于Carisolv去腐。半年后的复查表明Carisolv去腐和球钻去腐后的充填体在微隙、继发龋率及脱落率方面差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论:Carisolv微创技术用于乳牙龋病治疗时,疼痛程度明显减轻,与球钻去腐相比,患儿多倾向于Carisolv去腐。Carisolv去腐不增加充填体的微隙和继发龋率。 Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of carisolv for chemomechanical caries in primary teeth.Methods:64 children,aged from 4 to 10 years,with symmetric coronal medium or deep caries in primary teeth were involved in the chinical study, According to a split-mouth design,in each patient,caries tissue was removed by using a round bur on one side,and carisolv on the other side.Ater caries removal,the teeth were restored with glass ionomer cement,the clinical efficacy was compared.Results:The patients felt more painful in the operation by drilling than by Carisolv (P〈0.01) ,97% of patients accepted the taste of Carisolv gel.The majority of patients preferred Carisolv to bur. After half year follow-up,there was no significant difference in the incidence of marginal microleakage, secondary caries and restoration lost between Carisolv and drilling treament (P〉0.05). Conclusion:Carisolv is a technique of less pain,the majority of patients accepte it.Carisolv may have no effect on the incidence of marginal microleakage and secondary caries.
出处 《现代医药卫生》 2008年第12期1760-1761,共2页 Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
关键词 CARISOLV 微创技术 乳牙 龋病 Carisolv Microlesion technique Primary teeth Dental caries
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献12

  • 1李淑娟,郑游,杨冬茹,黄香河,武明轩.酸蚀处理影响Dyract复合体修复楔状缺损边缘微渗漏的研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2005,21(3):422-423. 被引量:7
  • 2姬爱平,王嘉德.应用牙本质粘合剂和复合树脂修复楔状缺损的临床评价[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1996,31(4):210-213. 被引量:93
  • 3洪法廉,洪咏菊,李友谊,蒋维中.Dyract与牙齿间密合度的扫描电镜观察[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,1996,6(4):215-216. 被引量:80
  • 4Weistein P,Shimono T,Domoto P,et al.Dental fear in Japan:Okayama prefecture school study of adolescents and adults.Anaesth Prog,1993,39(6):215.
  • 5Habib C,Kronman J,Goldman M.A chemical evaluation of collagen and hydroxyproline after treatment with GK-101 (N-chloroglycine).Pharmacol Ther Dent,1975,2(3-4):209.
  • 6Ericson D,Zimmerman M,Raber H,et al.Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo-mechanical removal of caries.A multi-centre study.Caries Res,1999,33(3):171.
  • 7Kakaboura A,Masouras C,Staikou O,et al.A comparative clinical study on the Carisolv caries removal method.Quintessence Int,2003,34(4):269.
  • 8Fure S,Lingstrom P,Birkhed D.Evaluation of Carisolv for the chemo-mechanical removal of primary root caries in vivo.Caries Res,2000,34(3):275.
  • 9Lumbau A,Lai Bachisio S,Lai C,et al.Evaluation of a new method of caries removal:In vivo study.Minerva Stomatol,2003,52(1-2):9.
  • 10Maragakis GM,Hahn P,Hellwig E.Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars and its acceptance by patients.Caries Res,2001,35(3):205.

共引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部