期刊文献+

组织政治行为对组织沉默的影响实证研究 被引量:9

The Empirical Research of Organizational Politics' impact on Organizational Silence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 组织政治行为与组织沉默是当今组织行为研究领域两大热点问题。本文从实证的角度出发,将这两个问题整合起来进行研究。首先在验证了组织政治行为对组织沉默的影响的基础上,经相关分析从员工、组织成员关系、组织体制和组织文化四个层面得出五个主要中介变量,并利用温忠麟的中介效应检验程序验证了这些中介变量的中介效应。然后在研究这些中介变量内部相关关系的基础上,提出了组织政治行为对组织沉默的影响模型。最后,利用双因素方差分析研究了内外源控制和自我监控对组织政治行为通过员工层面影响组织沉默的过程的影响。 Organizational Politics and Organizational Silence are two of the most promising topics in the field of organization behavior. In this paper, we study the relationship from the version of empirical research. After verifying the influence of the Organizational Politics to Organizational Silence, we obtain five important intermediate variables from the four perspectives of staff. Relationship between organizational members, organizational structure and organizational culture, whose Intermediate effect are tested by Wen Zhong Lin' s Testing procedures of Intermediate effect. Based on the correlation been the five intermediate variables, we finally post the model of the influence of the Organizational Politics to Organizational Silence. We also study how the locus of control and self-monitors effect the course of the influence of the Organizational Politics to Organizational Silence by the Two-factor analysis of variance.
作者 刘智强 荆波
出处 《预测》 CSSCI 2008年第3期36-42,共7页 Forecasting
基金 湖北省科技厅科技攻关资助项目(2007AA401C26) 华中科技大学人文社科青年基金重点资助项目(2006010)
关键词 组织政治行为 组织沉默 中介效应 :organizational politics organizational silence intermediate effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1何铨,马剑虹,Hora H.Tjitra.沉默的声音:组织中的沉默行为[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(3):413-417. 被引量:89
  • 2Vakola M, Bouradas D, Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence : an empirical investigation[ J], Employee Relations, 2005, 27(4/5): 441-453.
  • 3孙汉银.论组织行为学中的组织政治知觉[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2004(1):45-50. 被引量:36
  • 4温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7810
  • 5Perlow C, Williams S. Is silence killing your company [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2003, 5: 52-58.
  • 6Morrison E W, Milliken F J. Organizational silence: a barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25 (4) : 706-731.
  • 7Pinder G G, Harlos H P. Employee silence: quiescence and acquiescence as response to perceived injustice [ J ]. Research in Personal and Human Resource Management, 2001, 20: 331-369.
  • 8Dyne L V, Ang S, Botero I C. Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs [ J ]. Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40 (6) : 1359-1392.
  • 9Morrison E W, Milliken F J. Speaking up, remaining silent: the dynamics of voice and silence in organizations [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40 (6) : 1353-1358.
  • 10Milliken F J, Morrison E W, Hewlin P F. An exploratory study of employee silence: issues that employees don't communicate upward and why [ J ]. Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40(6): 1453-1476.

二级参考文献71

  • 1[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 2[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 3[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 4[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 5[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 6[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 7[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312
  • 8[10]Sobel M E. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In: J S Long (Ed.) Common problems/proper solutions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988. 46~64
  • 9[11]Clogg C C, Petkova E, Shihadeh E S. Statistical methods for analyzing collapsibility in regression models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1992, 17(1): 51~74
  • 10[12]Freedman L S, Schatzkin A. Sample size for studying intermediate endpoints within intervention trials of observational studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1992, 136: 1148~1159

共引文献7984

同被引文献70

引证文献9

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部