期刊文献+

三维适形及调强放疗摆位误差分析 被引量:21

Analyzing of Set-up Errors in Three-dimensional Conformal and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:测定和分析三维适形及调强放疗的摆位误差,并依此计算CTV外扩PTV边界的大小。方法:对2007年5月-6月的162例患者的摆位误差进行测定。体位固定头颈部采用头模或头颈肩模,胸、腹部采用负压袋。每例患者第一次治疗前及以后的每周都在加速器上拍摄正、侧位等中心验证片各一张,与治疗计划系统中的DRR片比较,计算出摆位误差。CTV到PTV外扩边界的大小由公式2.5Σ+0.7σ计算得出,其中Σ为系统误差,σ为随机误差。结果:由公式得出我科外扩PTV的理论边界分别为:头颈部X、Y、Z方向各为1.01mm,0.59mm,2.29mm,胸部各方向分别为2.77mm,2.16mm,3.41mm,腹部各方向分别为2.50mm,4.11mm,3.55mm。结论:通过对摆位误差的分析为我科外扩CTV边界提供了理论依据,确定了CTV到PTV外扩边界的大小,使得我科治疗计划的设计更为科学合理。 Objective: To examine and analyze the set-up errors for patients with three dimensional conformal and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy to calculate CTV referential safety margins of PTV. Methods: The set-up errors of 162 patients during May-June in 2006 were examined in this study. Thermoplastic mask was used for head and neck and vacuum cushion was used for chest and abdomen immobilization. The verification films were taken for each patient prior the first treatment and the latter per week were compared with the digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) on treatment planning system, in order to make sure set-up errors. CTV margin should be calculated with the formula 2.5∑+0.7σ, ∑means Systematic Error, σ means Random Error. Result: The margin of PTV of head and neck in three directions (X,Y,Z) was 1.01 mm, 0.59 mm and 2.29 mm respectively, the margin of PTV of chest in three directions (X,Y,Z) was 2.77 mm ,2.16 mm and 3.41 mrn respectively and the margin of PTV of abdomen in three directions (X,Y,Z) was 2.50 mm, 4.11 mm and 3.55 mm respectively. Conclusion: It has laid a theoretic foundation for our CTV margins by analyzing the set-up errors and made our design of radiotherapy system more scientific and normal.
出处 《中国医学物理学杂志》 CSCD 2008年第3期641-642,669,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
关键词 适形放疗 摆位误差 边界 conformal Radiotherapy set-up errors margin
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Prescribing recording and reporting photon beam therapy [R]. ICRU. Report no.50. 1993.
  • 2Prescribing recording and reporting photon beam therapy (Supplement to ICRU report 50) [R]. ICRU. Report no. 62. 1999.
  • 3Van Herk M, Remeijer P, Lebesque Jr. Inclusion of geometric uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2002,52(5):1407-1422.
  • 4Mckenzie A, Van Herk M, Mijnheer B. Margins for geometric uncertainty around organs at risk in radiotherapy [J]. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2002,62(3):299-307.
  • 5Hurkmans CW, Remeijer P, Lebesque JV, et al. Set-up verification using portal images review of current clinical practice [J]. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2001,58(2):105-120.
  • 6Stroom JC, de Boer HC, Huizenga H, et al. Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999,43(4):905-919.
  • 7Joseph Hanley, Marc M. Debois, Dennis Mah, et al. Deep inspiration breath-hold technique for lung tumors: the potential value of target immobilization and reduced lung density in dose escalation [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999,45(3):603-611.
  • 8Kenneth E. Rosenzweig, Joseph Hanley, Dennis Mah, et al. The deep inspiration breath-hold technique in the treatment of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000, 48(1): 1-87.
  • 9Joshua J. Haslam, Anthony E. Lujan, Arno J. Mundt, et al. Setup errors in patients treated with intensitymodulated whole pelvic radiation therapy for gynecological malignancies [J]. Medical Dosimetry. 2005, 30(1):36-42.

同被引文献154

引证文献21

二级引证文献115

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部