摘要
明代李梦阳出于复古心态反思唐代赋学而提出"唐无赋"之说,实则忽略了有唐一代辞赋的发展。宋本《文苑英华》的《杂文·骚》类辑录骚体赋四十二篇,又《杂文·问答》亦辑录九首骚体作品。数量虽不是最多,但骚情意绪,愁思郁结,正是唐人对楚辞骚体形式的再创与延续。其中更不乏对屈原的惋惜与追念,如柳宗元作《吊屈原》、刘蜕作《吊屈原辞》均是对屈原其人的直接伤悼与追惜。
Li Mengyang in the Ming dynasty retrospected the Fu literature of the Tang dynasty and raised the statement that there's no Fu in the Tang dynasty because of his back-to-the-ancients ideology. Actually, he neglected the development of Fu literature of Tang .The type of"Essay. Sao"in "Wen Yuan Ying Hua" in the Song Dynasty recorded 42 fus of Sao'style. The "Essay. Question and answer" also recorded nine works of Sao's style .Although the amount isn't the largest, but it inherited the sad feeling of Qu-Yuan, which is exactly the recreation and continuing of Sao by people in Tang Dynasty.There are also many works on mourning for Qu-Yuan among them, for example,"mourning Qu Yuan" by Liu Zongyuan and Liu Tui respectively. Both of these works cherished the man, Qu-Yuan.
出处
《云梦学刊》
2008年第3期38-44,共7页
Journal of Yunmeng
关键词
屈原
杜甫
离骚
楚辞
Qu Yuan
Du Fu
Lisao
Chu Tz