期刊文献+

树脂黏结剂对纤维桩剪切黏结强度的研究 被引量:5

Research of shear bonding strength of fiber posts bonding with resin cements
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较两种树脂黏结系统对纤维桩的黏结强度,分析纤维桩在牙根不同部位的黏结力大小。方法选用10颗离体上頜中切牙并与釉牙骨质界冠方上1 mm处截冠,常规根管治疗后随机分两组,根管预备后分别用One-step和Panavia F两种黏结系统将石英纤维桩黏固于根管内,通过推出实验分别测试两种树脂黏结系统在牙根不同部位的黏结强度,并进行统计学分析和比较。结果One-step和Panavia F黏结系统的黏结强度分别为(10.466±0.939)MPa和(9.480±0.876)MPa,两者比较差异显著(P<0.05);One-step和Panavia F黏结系统根颈部和根尖部的总体黏结强度分别为(10.747±0.662)MPa和(9.200±0.632)Mpa,两者比较差异显著(P<0.05)。结论全酸蚀黏结系统对纤维桩的黏结强度大于自酸蚀黏结系统;树脂黏结剂在根颈部对纤维桩的黏结强度大于根尖部。 Objective To compare the bonding strength of fiber posts cemented to root canals with two different resin cements and to analyse the strength in different position of the root canal. Methods Ten teeth were collected and the crown portion of each tooth was removed by cutting with a diamond blade under copious water cooling 1 mm upwards the cementum enamel junction. After the root canal therapy, they were randomly divided into 2 groups ( n = 5). One group were bonded to root canals with One-step and the other with Panavia F after the root canal preparation. Then the push out test was conducted to assess the push out shear bond strength of the specimen. The data were compared and analysed. Results The mean push out shear bonding strength of the groups cementd with One-step and Panavia was ( 10. 466 ± 0. 939) MPa and (9. 480 ±0.876) Mpa, respectively. There were significant differences between them (P 〈 0.05). And the mean push out shear bonding strength of the coronal level group and the apex level group was (10. 747 ± 0. 662 )MPa and (9. 200 ± 0. 632 ) Mpa, respectively. There also exited significant differences between them (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The total-etching adhesive system may gain higher bonding strength than self-etching adhesive system, and the resin cements may gain higher bonding strength in the coronal portion of the teeth than in the apex portion.
出处 《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期567-570,共4页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
基金 上海市重点学科(特色学科)建设项目(T0202)~~
关键词 纤维桩 树脂黏结剂 黏结强度 fiber post resin cement bonding strength
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Ferrari M,Vichi A, Mannocci F, et al. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts [ J ]. Am J Dent, 2000,13 (Spec No) :9B - 13B.
  • 2Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test [ J ]. Dent Mater, 1994,10 (4) :236 - 240.
  • 3Nakabayashi N. Resin reforced dentine due to infiltration of monomers into the dentine at the adhesiveintedace[ J]. Jpn Dent Mater, 1982,3(1) :78 -81.
  • 4Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, et al. The clinical performance of adhesives [ J ]. J Dent, 1998 ;26 ( 1 ) : 1 - 20.
  • 5Mohan B, Kandaswamy D. A confocal microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin interface using adhesive systems with three different solvents bonded to dry and moist dentinan in vitro study[ J]. 2005, 36(7 -8) :511 -521.
  • 6Inoue S, Koshiro K, Yoshida Y, et al. Hydrolytic stability of selfetch adhesives bonded to dentin [ J ]. J Dent Res,2005,84 ( 12 ) : 1160 - 1164.
  • 7Salz U, Zimmermann J, Zeuner F, et al. Hydrolytic stability of selfetching adhesive systems [ J ]. J Adhes Dent, 2005,7 ( 2 ) : 107 - 116.
  • 8Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, et al. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate [ J ]. Am J Dent, 2000,13 (5) :255 -260.
  • 9Mannocci F, Ferrafi M, Watson TF. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a confocal microscopic study[ J]. J Prosthet Dent,2001,85 (3) :284 -291.
  • 10孙喆,梁景平,张岚.声波器械去除根管玷污层能力的比较研究[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2005,15(7):382-386. 被引量:13

二级参考文献8

  • 1Tronstad L, Barnett F, Schwartzben L, et al. Effectiveness and safety of a sonic vibratory endodontic instrument[ J]. Endod Dent Traumatol, 1985,1: ( 2 ) 69 - 76
  • 2Ahmad M, Ford TRP, Crum LA. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: acoustic streaming and its possible role[ J]. J Endodon,1987,13 (10) :490 -499
  • 3Lumley PJ. Cutting ability of Heliosonic, Rispisonic, and Shaper files[ J]. J Endodon, 1997,23 (4) :221 - 224
  • 4Lumly PJ,Harrington E,Walmsley AD,et al. Taper and stiffness of sonic endodontic files[J]. Endod Dent Traumatol, 1996,12(2) :77 -81
  • 5Lumley PJ, Walmsley AD, Marquis PM. Analysis of surface cut by sonic files [ J ]. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1996,12 ( 5 : 240 -45
  • 6Martin H, Cunningham WT, Norris JP, et al. Ultrasonic versus hand filing of dentin: a quantitative study [ J ]. Oral Surg, 1980,49(1) :79 -81
  • 7Walmsley AD, Williams AR. Effect of constraint on the oscillatory pattern of endosonic files [ J ]. J Endodon, 1989,15 ( 5 ): 189 -194
  • 8Baroni B, Fariniuk LF, Marchesan MA, et al. Effectiveness of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques for cleaning flattened root canals [ J ]. J Endodon,2002,28 (5) :365 - 366

共引文献12

同被引文献92

引证文献5

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部