期刊文献+

论责任保险中直接诉讼的法律适用 被引量:1

On the applicable law of direct action in the liability insurance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 责任保险中的直接诉讼,是指对被保险人享有责任请求权的第三人,可以对保险人直接提起诉讼。从国外立法来看,已有一些国家赋予了第三人直接诉讼的权利,但是由于对第三人所采取的保护程度和责任保险的种类不同,直接诉讼的条件也存在差异,这就不可避免的会产生法律冲突。目前已有一些国家和国际条约对以非合同责任为标的的责任保险中的直接诉讼规定了法律适用规则,但对以合同责任为标的的责任保险中的直接诉讼规定法律适用的则极为罕见,这是一个很大缺陷。直接诉讼应适用可选择的连接点,以利于更充分保护第三人的合法权益。 Direct action in the liability insurance is that the third party has liability claims and can bring a direct litigation against the insurer. The third party is granted the right of direct action in certain countries, though conditions vary and liability types differ. So, legal conflicts occur. Moreover, international treaties stipulate the applicable law of direct action in the liability insurance for non-contract liability, but hardly stipulate that for contractual liability. Therefore, the paper argues for a more applicable law to connecting points for the sake of the third party.
作者 尚清 高广飞
出处 《河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2008年第3期56-60,共5页 Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 责任保险 直接诉讼 法律适用 合同责任 非合同责任 liability insurance direct action applicable law contract non-contract
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[1](加)威廉·泰特雷著,刘兴莉译.国际冲突法:普通法、大陆法及海洋法[M].北京:法律出版社,2003.
  • 2[2]Peter Nygh,Autonomy in international contract,Clarendon Press,Oxford,1999.
  • 3[3]Australian law Reform Commission,Choice of Law,Report No 58(1992),Uniform Choice of Law Bill,clause7(4).
  • 4[4]Leflar,McDougal Ⅲ and Felix,American Conflicts Law,NY:Transnational Publishers,1988.
  • 5[5]Francesco Seatzu,Insurance in Private International law,A European Perspective,Hart publishing,2003.
  • 6[3]See Filma C--Trade S.A.v.Newcastle Protection & Indemni-ty Association[1987]2 Lloyd's Rep.299;Secony Mobil Oil CO.Inc.and Others v.West of England Ships Owners Mutual In-surance Association Ltd.[1987]2 Lloyd's Rep.599.
  • 7[5]Arts.2500-2502,2396 and 2628 of the Quebec Civil Code 1991.
  • 8[7]See Plozza V.South Australian Insurance Co.Ltd.[1963]S.A.S.R.122;Hall v.National and General Insurance Co.Ltd.[1967]V.R.355;Stewart v.Honey(1972)2 S.A.S.R.585.

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部