期刊文献+

锁骨下喙突入路臂丛神经阻滞——单点定位法和两点定位法的比较 被引量:1

Infraclavicular brachial plexus block by the coracoid approach:a comparison of the effectiveness between single-and dual-injection techniques
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的采用随机对照临床试验的方法对两点法和单点法这两种定位方法在锁骨下喙突入路臂丛阻滞中的效果进行比较。方法57名拟于锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞下行前臂和手部手术的患者被随机分为单点组(Group Single,n=29)和两点组(Group Dual,n=28),采用神经刺激仪在锁骨下部定位臂丛神经,单点组定位臂丛后束,引发伸腕伸指动作后注入0.5%罗哌卡因30mL;两点组除定位后束外,追加定位臂丛外侧束肌皮神经组分,引发屈肘反应,分别注入0.5%的罗哌卡因20mL和10mL。阻滞后每隔10min评价臂丛神经所支配的所有上肢7支终末神经的感觉阻滞情况,同时记录总体评分、操作时间和不良反应的发生率。结果阻滞后10min,两点组的肌皮神经的阻滞率高于单点组,阻滞后30min,两点组中肌皮神经和前臂内侧皮神经的阻滞率高于单点组(89.3%vs62.1%;85.7%vs58.6%,P<0.05)。两组的总体评分无差异(11.5±2.4vs10.8±4.3)。结论对于锁骨下喙突入路神经阻滞,用神经刺激器引发2个运动反应后分次注入局麻药的方法优于单点法。 Objective To evaluate the hypothesis that dual injection technique in infraclavicular brachial plexus block by the coracoid approach might enhance sensory block for anesthesia of the upper limb compared with a single-injection technique. Methods Fifty-seven patients scheduled for surgery below the elbow were randomly assigned to receive the infraclavicular brachial plexus block by the cor- acoid approach guided by nerve stimulator with either single-injection technique (Group Single, n = 29) or dual-injection technique (Group Dual, n = 28). In group single, 30 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected after eliciting one distal extensive motor response in the upper limb with a nerve stimulator for block. In group dual, the musculocutaneus nerve of brachial plexus was also located, the same volume of anesthetic was injected in separate doses of 10 mL and 20mL after elicitation of two different motor responses( flection of the elbow and extensive of the wrist or fingers). Sensory block was assessed in the upper limb every 10 minutes after the end of injection of the local anesthetic. The time that needed to complete the block and the side effects were also recorded. Results Ten minutes after blockade, higher rates of sensory block in the derrnatome of musculocutaneus nerve was read in group dual than in group single. Thirty minutes after blockade, significantly higher rates of sensory block to pinprick on the distributions of musculocutaneous nerve(89. 3 % vs 62. 1%, P〈0. 05) and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve(85.7% vs 58. 6%, P〈0. 05 ) were found in group dual than in group single. No difference was observed in global scores between the two groups(P〉0. 05). Condusios Dual- in-jection technique guided by nerve stimulator increases block by the coracoid approach compared with a single anesthetic. the efficacy for infraclavicular brachial plexus injection technique with the same dose of local
出处 《复旦学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第3期369-372,共4页 Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences
关键词 麻醉 臂丛 神经传导阻滞 喙突 anesthesia brachial plexus nerve bloek coracoid
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Winnie AP.Infraclavicular brachial plexus bloek-a new approach[J].Anesth Analg,1973,52:903-904.
  • 2Raj PP,Montgomery SJ,Nettles D,et al.Infraclavicular brachial plexus block-a new approach[J].Anesth Analg,1973,52:897-903.
  • 3Desroches J.The infraclavicular brachial plexus block by the coracoid approach is clinically effective:an observation study of 150 patients[J].Can J Anesth,2003,50(3),253-257.
  • 4李佩盈,车薛华,顾华华,梁伟民.定位臂丛神经后束对锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞效果的影响[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(29):2058-2061. 被引量:11
  • 5Fuzier R,Fourcade O,Fuzier V,et al.Double-vs.singleinjection infraclavicular plexus block in the emergency setting:higher success rate with lower volume of local anaesthetic[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2006,23 (4):271-275.
  • 6Whiffler K.Coracoid block:a safe and easy technique[J].Br J Anaesth,1981,53:845-848.
  • 7Kilka HG,Geiger P,Mehrkens HH.Infraclavicular vertical brachial plexus blockade:a new technique of regional anaesthesia[J].Anaesth,1995,44:339-344.
  • 8Wilson JL,Brown DL,Wong GY,et al.Infraclavicular brachial pelxus block:parasagittal anatomy important to the coracoid technique[J].Anesth Analg,1998,87:870-873.
  • 9Kapral S,Jandrasits O,Schabemig C,et al.Lateral infraclavicular plexus block vs.axillary block for hand and forearm surgery[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,1999.43:1047-1052.
  • 10Jandard C,Gentili ME,Girard F,et al.Infraclavicular with lateral approach and nerve stimulation:Extent of anesthesia and adverse effects[J].Reg Anesth Pain Med,2002,27:37-42.

二级参考文献29

  • 1车薛华,梁伟民,张洁.影响腋路臂丛神经阻滞效果的因素分析[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(2):117-119. 被引量:8
  • 2Baranowski AP, Pither CE. A comparison of three methods of axillary brachial plexus anesthesia. Anaesthesia, 1990,45: 362.
  • 3Sia S, Bartoli M, Lepri A, et al. Multiple-injection axillary brachial plexus block: A comparison of two method of nerve localizationnerve stimulation versus paresthesia. Anesth Analg,2000,91:647.
  • 4Sia S,Lepri A, Ponzecchi P. Axillary brachial plexus block using peripheral nerve stimulator: A comparison between double- and tripleinjection techniques. Reg Anesth Pain Med ,2001,26:499.
  • 5Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Hesselbjerg L, Fejlberg V. Comparison of transarterial and multiple nerve stimulation techniques for an initial axillary block by 45 mL of mepivacaine 1% with adrenaline. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand , 1998,42:570.
  • 6Sia S,Bartoli M. Selective ulnar nerve localization is not essential for axillary brachial plexus block using a multiple nerve stimulation technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med ,2001,26:12.
  • 7Gaermer E, Kern O, Mahoudeau G, et al. Block of the brachial plexus branches by the humeral route. A prospective study in 503 ambulatory patients. Proposal of a nerve-blocking sequence. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand , 1999,43: 609.
  • 8Barker KF, Coventry DM. Sequence of nerve blockade in brachial plexus anaesthesia-safety before speed. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2000,44:1028.
  • 9Cheney FW,Domino KB,Caplan RA, et al. Nerve injury associated with anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology, 1999,90:1062.
  • 10Cooper K,Kelley H,Carrither J. Perceptions of side effects following axillary block usedfor out patient surgery. Reg Anesth, 1995,20(3) :212.

共引文献19

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部