期刊文献+

后腹腔镜治疗输尿管腔外良性压迫所致肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻 被引量:3

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty for the treatment of UPJ obstruction due to benign oppression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨后腹腔镜治疗输尿管腔外良性病变压迫所致肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的优势。方法21例良性病变压迫所致肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻患者,其中纤维索带压迫7例,异位血管压迫11例,腔静脉后输尿管压迫3例。术前均经B超,静脉肾盂造影(IVP),16层螺旋CT尿路造影(CTU)确诊后采用后腹腔镜下解除肾盂输尿管连接部外在压迫,行肾盂成形术。结果手术均顺利且证实术前诊断,手术时间1-3 h,平均94 min;出血量50-120 mL,平均95 mL;术后住院时间5-7 d,平均5.6 d。术后随访3个月到1年,肾脏、输尿管积水明显好转。结论CTU对良性病变压迫所致肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的定位及定性诊断具有特殊价值。后腹腔镜下解除压迫,行肾盂成形术具有损伤小、术后恢复快和住院时间短等优点,有良好的临床应用前景。 Objective To evaluate the technique of retroperitoneal laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction due to benign oppression. Methods 21 cases which were diagnosed UPJ obstruction due to benign oppression, including fiber chords in 7 cases, cross vessels in 11 and postcaval ureter in 3 by ultrasound B, IVP and CTU, underwent laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty via postabdominal cavity approach. Results All the operations were accomplished uneventfully. The operation time was 1-3 hours (mean, 94 min), and the estimated intraoperative blood loss, 50-120 mL (mean, 95 mL). The postoperative hospital stay was 5-7 d (mean, 5.6 d). 3 to 12 months after the procedure, hydronephrosis, which were investigated by Ultrasound B and IVP, were significantly improved. Conclusion CTU examination is a good alternative for patients. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty is safe and efficient for the treatment of UPJ obstruction due to benign oppression. It is a promising technigue in clinical practice.
出处 《现代泌尿外科杂志》 CAS 2008年第3期215-216,共2页 Journal of Modern Urology
关键词 肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻 肾盂成形术 后腹腔镜 ureteropelvic junction obstruction Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty laparoscopic
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献31

  • 1南勋义,陈兴发,张学斌.输尿管段再生与替代材料动物实验[J].中华实验外科杂志,1995,12(4):213-214. 被引量:12
  • 2宋毅,李鸣,那彦群.记忆合金网状支架治疗输尿管狭窄的长期随访报告[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(42):2992-2994. 被引量:9
  • 3[1]O'Reilly P H, Brooman P J, Mak S, et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int, 2001, 87:287-289.
  • 4[2]Cohen T D, Gross M B, Preminger G M. Long-term follow-up of Acucise incision of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and ureteral stricture. Urology, 1996, 47:317-323.
  • 5[3]Danuser H, Ackermann D K, Bohlen D. Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: risk factors determine the success rate. J Urol, 1998, 159:56-61.
  • 6[4]Gupta M, Tuncay O L, Smith A. Open surgical exploration after failed endopyelotomy: A 12-year experience. J Urol, 1997, 157:1613-1619.
  • 7[5]Bernado N, Smith A D. Endopyelotomy review. Arch Esp Urol, 1999, 52:541-548.
  • 8[6]Turk I A, Davis J W, Winkelmann B, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty-the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol, 2002, 42:268-275.
  • 9[7]Jarrett T W, Chan D Y, Charambura T C, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol, 2002, 167:1253-1256.
  • 10[8]Eden C G, Cahill D, Allen J D. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases. BJU Int, 2001, 88:526-531.

共引文献104

同被引文献28

  • 1张大宏,刘锋,李新德.腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术的疗效比较[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(3):171-174. 被引量:24
  • 2汪官富,章灵芝,卢思保,陈安屏,韩子华,朱汝健,王天济,陈劭泱.先天性血管压迫致输尿管梗阻的诊断治疗与微创手术[J].临床医学,2007,27(6):1-3. 被引量:1
  • 3郭应禄,周利群等译.Alanj J,et al原著.坎贝尔-沃尔什泌尿外科学[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2009.
  • 4KLINGLER HC,REMZI M,JANETSCHEK G,et al.Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction[J].Eur Urol,2003,44:340-345.
  • 5DIMARCO D S,GETTMAN M T,MCGEE S M,et al.Longterm success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution[J].J Endourol,2006,20(10):707-712.
  • 6GUPTA O,TUNCAY OL,SMITH AD.Open surgical exploration of failed endopyelotomy:a 12-year perspective[J].J Urol,1997,157:1613-1619.
  • 7JABBOUR ME,GOLDFISCHER ER,KLIMA WJ,et,al.Endopyelotomy after failed pyeloplasty:the long-term results[J].J Urol,1998,160(3):690-693.
  • 8Dimarco DS,Gettman MT,Mcgee SM. Longterm success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution[J].Journal of Endocrinology,2006,(10):707-712.
  • 9Gupta O,Tuncay OL,Smith AD. Open surgical exploration of failed endopyelotomy:A 12-year perspective[J].Journal of Urology,1997,(05):1613-1619.
  • 10Jabbour ME,Goldfischer ER,Klima WJ. En dopyelotomy after failed pyeloplasty:the long-term results[J].Journal of Urology,1998,(3 Pt 1):690-693.

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部