期刊文献+

可理解性语言输入构成及其实现 被引量:2

The Formation of Comprehensible Input and Realization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Krashen提出的可理解性语言输入i+1仅仅是指学习者获得的、作为学习对象的语言信息。而这样的语言信息输入之所以能被学习者理解和吸收,是由于各种相关内容作为辅助信息伴随对象语言内容一同被学习者所接受。因此,可以将i+1+X视为广义的可理解性输入。X(称为相关内容)有多种呈现形式,各种形式之间可以和i+1有效结合,构成可理解性输入的整体。要实现输入的可理解性,就必须对i+1的量有正确的认识,增强相关内容输入的多样性和融合性,理解输入与吸收的问题,并促进课堂意义的协商。 Comprehensible Input ( i + 1 ) proposed by Krashen refers only to the language information as learning objectives. It is, however, because of auxiliary information of various types that enters into a language learner's mind together with the targeted language information that promotes language input into intake. Therefore, i + 1 + X can be regarded as comprehensible input in a broad sense. There are many forms that X (named Related Content) can take and these forms may well cooperate with i + 1 to form comprehensible input as a whole. To make the comprehension of input possible, there must be correct understandings about the amount of i + 1, enhancement of the diversity and compatibility of Related Content, understandings of input and intake issues, as well as promoting meaning negotiation in classrooms.
作者 雷绿亨
出处 《重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版)》 2008年第3期111-113,共3页 Journal of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 可理解性输入 I+1 构成 相关内容 实现 comprehensible input i + 1 components related content realization
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献23

  • 1White, L. The "Pro-drop" parameter in adult second language acquisition[J]. Language Learning, 1985, (35): 47-62.
  • 2Lakshmanan, U. The role of parametric variation in adult second language acquisition: A study of the "pro-drop" parameter[J]. Papers in Applied Linguistics. Michigan: Ann Arbor, 1986,(2):97-118.
  • 3Gass, S. & J. Ard. L2 acquisition and the ontology of language universals[A]. W. Rutherford. Language Universals and Second Language Acquisition[C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1984. 33-68.
  • 4Gass, S. Universals, SLA and language pedagogy: 1984 re-visited[A]. L. Eubank,, L. Selinker & M. Sharwood Smith. The Current State of Interlanguage[C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1995. 31-42.
  • 5Rumelhart, D. & J. McMelland. On learning the past tense of English verbs[A]. J. McClelland & D. Rumelhart. Parallel Distributed Processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol.2: Psychological and Biological Models[C]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986. 216-71.
  • 6Brown, G., K. Malmkjoer & J. Williams. Performance and Competence in Second Language Acquisition[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 153.
  • 7Ellis, N. C. Analyzing language sequence in the sequence of language acquisition: Some comments on Major and Ioup[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1996, (18): 361-8.
  • 8Seidenberg, M. S. Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints[J]. Science, 1997, 275:1599-1603.
  • 9Gass, S. & L. Selinker. Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course[M]. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993.92-95.
  • 10Guion, S. G., J. E. Flege, S. H. Liu & G. H. Yeni-Komshian. Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language[J]. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2000,(21):205-228.

共引文献221

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部