期刊文献+

我国农民专业合作社的双重委托—代理关系——兼论存在的问题及改进思路 被引量:106

The Double Principal-agent Relationships of Farmer Specialized Cooperatives in China——Concurrent Analysis of the Problems and Their Improvements
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国以少数人控制为特征的农民专业合作社表现出双重委托—代理关系的特征,其中中小社员与核心社员之间的委托—代理关系成为矛盾的主要方面,在实践中表现出对中小社员利益的侵害与合作社整体价值的损失。笔者认为,问题的症结在于表面健全的治理结构实际上流于形式,并提出相应的改进意见和措施。 The characteristic of double Principal-agent relationships is the farmer specialized cooperatives controlled by minority show in China.The contravention between middle-small association members and core association members is the main aspects of their principal-agent relationships.In practice,it invades middle-small associators' profit and caused lost of whole cooperative's value.This article argues that the sticking point of the problem is the perfect governance structure seems to be just in form,and make some suggestions and measures accordingly.
出处 《农业经济问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期55-60,共6页 Issues in Agricultural Economy
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"促进农民专业合作社健康发展研究"(07BJY099)资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Cook, M. L The Future of U. S. Agricultural Cooperatives : A Neo-lnstitutional Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1995, 77 (10) : 1153 -1159.
  • 2Eliers, C. & Hanf, C. H. Contracts Between Farmers and Farmers Processing Cooperatives: A principal-agent Approach for the Potato Starch Industry. Galizzi, G. &Venturini L In Vertical Relationship and Coordination in the Food System. Heidelberg,Physica, 1999:267 -284.
  • 3Phillips, R. Economic Nature of the Cooperative Association. Journal of Farm Economics, 1953 (35) :74 -87.
  • 4Sexton, R. J. The Formation of Cooperatives: A Game-Theoretic Approach with Implications for Cooperative Finance, Decision Making, and Stability. American Journal of Agricultural Economicd, 1986, 68 (2) :214 -215.
  • 5冯根福.双重委托代理理论:上市公司治理的另一种分析框架——兼论进一步完善中国上市公司治理的新思路[J].经济研究,2004,39(12):16-25. 被引量:309
  • 6王义伟.合作社内部制度安排:基于利益分配视角的研究.硕士学位论文,浙江大学,2005.
  • 7李慧.温州农村专业合作经济组织发展研究.温州市科技局软科学研究项目课题报告,2004.
  • 8曼瑟尔.奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑.上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1995.

二级参考文献19

  • 1青木昌彦 见胡鞍钢 胡光宇编.2002《公司治理的比较制度分析》[A].见胡鞍钢,胡光宇编.《公司治理中外比较》[C].北京新华出版社,2004年版..
  • 2泰勒尔1988.《产业组织理论》[M].北京中国人民大学出版社,1997年版..
  • 3因内恩·马克—斯达德勒 丁·大卫·佩雷斯—卡斯特里罗1994.《信息经济学引论:激励与合约》[M].上海财经大学出版社,2004年版..
  • 4Come, Ronald, 1937, The Nature of the Finn, Economics 4, 386-405.
  • 5Claessens,S, S Djankov and L H P Lang, 2000, "The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations", Journal of Financial Economics, 58,81- 112.
  • 6Faccio, M and L H P Lang , 2002,"The Ultimate Ownership of Western European Corporations", Journal of Financial Economics 65, 365-396.
  • 7Fama,Eugence, and Michael Jensen, 1983a, Separation of Ownership and Control, Journal of Law and Economics 26, 301-325.
  • 8Fama,Eugence, and Michael Jensen, 1983b, Agency Problems and Residuals Claims, Journal of Law and Economics 26, 327-349.
  • 9Franks, Julian , and Colin Mayer, 1994, The Ownership and Control of German Corporation, Manuscript, London Business School.
  • 10OECD, 2001, Corporate Governance in Asia, PP. 7- 10.

共引文献309

同被引文献1244

引证文献106

二级引证文献928

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部