期刊文献+

专利复审程序中的“举证原则”

Burden of Proof in Patent Reexamination Proceedings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在我国的民事诉讼及行政诉讼中,“举证原则”是一个十分重要的诉讼原则。 《民事诉讼法》第64条规定:“当事人对自己提出的主张,有责任提供证据。” 最高人民法院于2001年12月公布的《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》第二条又进一步规定:“当事人封自己提出的诉讼请求所依据的事实或者反驳封方诉讼请求所依据的事实有责任提供证据加以证明。 The burden of proof is one of the very important litigation doctrines in the civil and administrative procedures in China. Article 64 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China provides that "an interested party shall be under the burden of proof with respect to his claims." Article 2 of the Several Provisions Concerning Evidence in Civil Procedure issued by the Supreme People's Court (SPC) in December 2001 further specifies that "a party shall be under the burden of proof to prove the facts on the basis of which he makes his litigant claims or allegation, or rebuts another party's litigant claims or allegations.
作者 张荣彦
出处 《中国专利与商标》 2008年第2期57-67,共11页 China Patents & Trademarks
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1.the Supreme Court‘s Reply No.117/2002 on the Issue of Division of Function Relating to Patent and Trademark Cases after the Amend- ment of the Patent Law and the Trademark Law[]..
  • 2.the Beijing Higher Court‘s Opinions on Implementation of the Supreme Court‘s Reply on the Issue of Division of Function Relating to Patent and Trademark Cases after the Amendment of the Patent Law and the Trademark Law and on Administrative Cases Invol[]..2002
  • 3.
  • 4.the Beijing No 1 Intermediate Court‘s Administrative Judgement No.Yizhongxingchuzi 125/[]..2006
  • 5.the Beijing No 1 Intermediate Court‘s Administrative Judgement No.Yizhongxingchuzi 30/[]..2001
  • 6.the Beijing No 1 Intermediate Court‘s Administrative Judgement No.Yizhongxingchuzi 524/[]..2007
  • 7.the Beijing Higher Court‘s Administrative Judgement No Gaox- ingzhongzi 183/[]..2006
  • 8.the Beijing No 1 Intermediate Court‘s Administrative Judgement No.Yizhongzhichuzi 195/[]..2001
  • 9.the Beijing Higher Court‘s Administrative Judgement No Gaom- inzhongzi 33/[]..2002
  • 10See the Beijing Higher Court‘s Administrative Judgement No. . 2006

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部