期刊文献+

商业银行管理层股票期权激励:特征及其影响因素--基于美国银行业的实证研究 被引量:6

Features and Determinants of Executives Stock Options in Commercial Banks: Evidences from U. S. Banking Industry
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以1996~2005年间美国43家代表性商业银行和98家制造业企业为样本,实证分析了商业银行管理层股票期权补偿激励的特征和影响因素。结果表明:商业银行管理层股票期权补偿占总报酬补偿比例的变化呈现出先升后降的倒U型趋势,商业银行管理层股票期权补偿占总报酬补偿的比例显著地低于制造业的这一比例;管理层股票期权补偿与商业银行成长机会、外部董事比例存在着显著的正相关关系,而与杠杆比率呈显著负相关;资产规模、管理层股票补偿对股票期权补偿水平的影响为负,但不显著;行业管制与管理层股票期权补偿费用的会计处理方法对银行业股票期权补偿有显著的影响。 We examine the features and determinants of executives stock options as a compensation in U. S. commercial hanks during 1996-2005. We find that, the ratio of executives stock options to total compensations in banking industry showed a inverted U shaped trends; on average, bank executives receive a smaller percentage of their total compensation in stock options than do executives in manufacturing industry; a positive and significant relation between the ratio of executives stock options to total compensation and growth opportunity, independence of boards, and a negative and significant relation between the ratio of executives stock options to total compensation and leverages; linkages between the ratio of executives stock options to total compensation and asset size, executives stockholdings are negative, but insignificant; regulations and accounting rules on the cost of executives stock options have significant effects on executives stock options.
作者 潘敏 董乐
出处 《国际金融研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期30-36,共7页 Studies of International Finance
基金 国家社科基金项目“基于银行业行业特征的商业银行公司治理机制研究”(项目批准号:06BJY107) 教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”项目 武汉大学国家“985”创新基地项目子课题的资助
关键词 商业银行 管理层股票期权 报酬补偿 Commercial Banks Executive Stock Options Compensation.
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Admas, R., and H. Mehran, Is corporate govemance different for banking holding Companies? [J] . FRBNY Economic P olicy Review, 2003, 123-142.
  • 2Baker, G.and B. Hall. CEO incentive and firm size[R]. NBER Working paper 6868, 1988.
  • 3Barro, J. and R. Barro. Pay, performance and turnover of bank CEOs [J] . Journal of Labor Economics 8, 1990, 448-481.
  • 4Brewer, E., W.C. Hunter, and W. E. Jackson. Investment opportunity set, product mix, and the relationship between bank CEO compensation and risk-taking[R]. Federal Reserve Bank of Atalanta, Working Paper, 2004.
  • 5Chhaochharia, V. and Y.Grnistein. CEO compensation and board structure [R] . World Bank, Working Paper, 2006.
  • 6Demsetz, H. and K.Lehn, The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequence[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1985, 93, 1155-1177.
  • 7Fama, E. E and M. C. Jensen. Separation of ownership and control [J] .Joumal of Law and Economics, 26, 1983, 301-325.
  • 8Guay, W. The sensitivity of CEO wealth to equity risk: an analysis of the magnitude and determinants [J]. Journal of Financial Economic, 1999, 53, 43-71.
  • 9Hall, B. J. and J. B.Liebman. Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats? [J] . Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1998, 653-91.
  • 10Harjoto, M. A. and D. J. Mullineaux. CEO compensation and the transformation of banking [J] . Journal of Financial Research, 2003, 341-354.

同被引文献60

引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部