期刊文献+

双因素领导结构的验证及其对组织承诺的影响机制研究 被引量:4

The Verification of the Structure of the Double-factor Leadership and a Study on their Mechanisms that Affect their Promises to the Organization
原文传递
导出
摘要 变革型领导理论的3个构成因素——变革型领导、交易型领导和放任型领导之间的区分问题常受到质疑。本研究致力于运用多因素领导问卷分析该理论的因素构成以及这些因素通过领导下属交换的中介作用对组织承诺的影响。来自6家组织144个团队的676位员工参与了本研究,结果显示:多因素领导问卷测评的领导行为可由积极建设型领导和消极校正型领导两因素构成,前者包括变革型领导、权变性奖励和积极例外管理,后者包括消极例外管理和放任型领导;下属的组织承诺与积极建设型领导和领导下属交换正相关,与消极校正型领导负相关;结构方程模型显示领导行为对下属组织承诺的影响以领导下属交换为中介。文章最后讨论了本研究的局限和未来的研究方向。 The discrimination between the reformatory, transactional and laissez-faire leadership-the three component factors that constitute the theory of reformatory leadership, is often questioned. This study is aimed at, by the use of the questionnaire on the multifactor leadership, analyzing the composition of the factors of this theory and the effect-achieved by the intermediary function of LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE (LMX)-of these factors on subordinates' organizational commitment. 676 employees from 144 teams in 6 organizations have participated in this study and rated their leaders with the said questionnaire. The results show that the leadership behavior appraised through this questionnaire consists of the active constructive leadership and the passive corrective leadership, the former including the reformatory leadership, the contingent reward leadership and the active management-by-exception leadership, the latter including the passive management-by-exception leadership and laissez-faire leadership, that subordinates' organizational commitment is positively correlated to the active constructive leadership and LMX and negatively correlated to the passive corrective leadership, and that the structure equation model indicates that the impact of leadership on subordinates' organizational commitment is made through LMX. At the end of this article, we have discussed the limitation and the orientation of this study.
作者 魏峰 李秀娟
出处 《管理世界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期115-123,共9页 Journal of Management World
  • 相关文献

参考文献52

  • 1陈永霞,贾良定,李超平,宋继文,张君君.变革型领导、心理授权与员工的组织承诺:中国情景下的实证研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(1):96-105. 被引量:213
  • 2李秀娟,魏峰.打开领导有效性的黑箱:领导行为和领导下属关系研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(9):87-93. 被引量:58
  • 3Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P., 1996, “Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization:An Examination of Construct Validity”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, pp.252-276.
  • 4Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W., 1988, “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two- step Approach”, Psychological Bulletin, 103, pp.411-423.
  • 5Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M. & Jung, D. I., 1999, "Re-examining the Components of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Using the Muhifactor Leadership Questionnaire", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, pp.441-462.
  • 6Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J., 1999, "Training Full Range Leadership", Redwood, CA, Mind Garden.
  • 7Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J., 1990, "The Implications of Transactional and Transformational Leadership for Individual, Team and Organizational Development", in Research in Organizational Change and Development,R.W. Woodman and W.A. Passmore (eds.), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • 8Bentler, P. M., 1990, "Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models", Psychological Bulletin, 107, pp.238-246.
  • 9Bentler, P. M. & Bonnett, D. G., 1980, "Significance Tests and Goodness of fit in the Analysis of Covariance structures", Psychological Bulletin, 88, pp.588-606.
  • 10Bliese, P. D., 1998, “Group size, ICC Values and Group-level Correlations: A Simulation”, Organizational Research Methods, 1, pp.355-373.

二级参考文献87

  • 1刘小平.组织承诺研究综述[J].心理科学进展,1999,9(4):31-37. 被引量:74
  • 2李超平,时勘.变革型领导与领导有效性之间关系的研究[J].心理科学,2003,26(1):115-117. 被引量:85
  • 3Spreitzer, G. M, 1995, "Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement and Validation", Academy of Management Journal,38(5): pp.1442-1465.
  • 4Spreitzer, G. M, Janasz, S. C, & Quinn, R. E, 1999,"Empowered to Lead: The Role of Psychological Empowerment in Leadership", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20 (4): pp.511-526.
  • 5Thomas, K. W, & Vehhouse, B. A, 1990,"Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An 'Interpretive' Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation", Academy of Management Review, 15 (4): pp.666-681.
  • 6Tsui, A. S, Pearce, J. L, Porter, L. W, & Tripoli, A.M, 1997, "Alternative Approaches to the Employee-organization Relationship: Does Investment in Employees Pay off?", Academy of Management Journal, 40: pp.1089-1121.
  • 7Waldman D. A, Ramirez G. G, House R. J, & Puranam P, 2001, "Does Leadership Matter? CEO Leadership Attributes and Profitability under Conditions of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty", Academy of Management Journal, 44 (1):pp.134-143.
  • 8Wang, H, Law, K. S, Hackett, R. D, Wang, D, &Chen, Z, 2005, "Leader-Member Exchange as a Mediator of the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Followers' Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior", Academy of Management Journal, 48(3): pp420-432.
  • 9Yousef, D. A, 2000, "Organizational Commitment: A Mediator of the Relationships of Leadership Behavior with Job Satisfaction and Performance in a Non-Western Country", Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(1): pp6-28.
  • 10Yukl, G. A, 1984, "Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research", Journal of Management, 15 (2): pp.251-289.

共引文献256

同被引文献102

引证文献4

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部