台湾“宪政改造”的法理透视——以“制宪权和修宪权的关系”为逻辑起点

A perspective of constituent government's reform in Taiwan——the relationship between constituent powers and constituent amendment powers as the analytical perspective

鉴于"中华民国宪法"对台湾社会的现实规制,本文拟从"制宪权和修宪权关系"的宪政理论角度,对"宪政改造"的法理意涵略做分析。作为制宪权的延续和派生,修宪权抛弃狭义制宪权寻求颠覆的暴戾。同时,"修宪"即使与"公投"配套,与始原性的制宪权的权力属性、行为性质也不同,而台独势力期待的"制宪"结果则是确立台湾"主权独立"的政治实体地位。因此,台湾地区应以修宪的方式将改革的成果写入宪法,但不得对"五权体制"、"权能区分"以及"中央与地方均权"的制宪精神和原则予以毁弃,亦不得超越程序方面的规制。

Given the actual regulation of ＂ The Constitution of Republic of China＂ to Taiwan＇s society, this paper intends to briefly analyze the jurisprudential meaning of ＂constituent reform＂, from the perspective of relationship between the powers of drafting and amending constitution. As the continuation and derivation of the constituent power, the constituent amendment right abandons the narrow right of drafting constitution while searching for subverted violence. Meanwhile, it is totally different with the original attributes, characteristics of conven tional rights, even though amendment rights goes with the ＂referendum＂ as a complementary. As those forces advocating for independence expect to have Taiwan established as a ＂sovereign and independent＂ political entity. Therefore, Taiwan shall integrate the reform result into the new constitution through amendment. However, Taiwan shall not spurn the spirit and principle of ＂five power system＂, ＂empowerment distinction,＂ and ＂equal powers between central and local governments＂, and shall not go beyond the procedural restriction.