法律行为概念辨析

Correlation Analysis of Conception of Juristic Act

法律行为作为德国民法中的一个人为概念,有对其进行阐释和体系化的价值。但学界中关于法律行为的各种不同定义导致了这一概念的不确定性,使它无法完成作为一个认知工具解决法律问题的使命。概念必须因生活需要而存在,法律行为的定义中既要包含其核心要素意思表示,又要充分重视这一概念的工具性价值,合理限定其属概念,即在定义中强调它的属概念为发生私法上效果的一种动态变化的行为,而不再作为一种法律事实予以强调。

Juristic act, as a manmade conception in German civil law, is worth interpreting and systematizing. All different sorts of different definitions of juristic act result in its indefiniteness, making it unable to accomplish its mission of reolving legal problems as a perceptual tool. Conception depends on life. The conception of juristic act must include its core factor declaration of intention and therefore should be emphasized that it brings about private law effect, not as a kind of juristic fact, but as a kind of dynamic act.