期刊文献+

中国权证市场认购权证的价格偏误研究 被引量:11

Call Warrants on the China Security Market:Pricing Biases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 使用Black-Scholes模型对中国权证市场上发行的认购权证进行了研究。研究表明,总体上权证的市场价格高于其模型价格80.38%(历史波动率参数的B/S模型)和140.50%(E-GARCH波动率参数的B/S模型);另一方面,随着时间的推移,市场价格和模型价格之间的偏误有减小的趋势。此外,研究还发现,2006年底至今,部分认购权证的市场价格不仅低于其模型价格,而且低于其价格下限。这似乎违反了无套利原则,但中国市场交易机制的限制(股票卖空限制、股票T+1交易机制)使得这一现象得以较长时间存在。当权证的市场价格低于其价格下限时,在特定的情况下,套利交易可以进行。 This paper examines the price performance of call warrants on the China security market. A recent sample of the daily call warrant prices observed during the period from August 2005 to March 2007 is used. On average,we find that the observed market prices are irrationally higher than the Black-Scholes model prices by 80.38%(using the 180-day history volatility)and 140.50%(using the EGARCH volatility). Besides,we find that some of call warrant prices are,not only lower than model prices,but also anomalously below the lower bounds recently. It seems to violate the "no arbitrage" principle. Among the convincing reasons, our findings indicate that trading mechanism constraints on the China security market prevent rational investors driving the prices of these call warrants to a reasonable level. Arbitrage chances exist in some specific cases when some call warrant prices are below their lower bounds.
作者 范为 陈宇
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 2008年第3期407-412,共6页 Chinese Journal of Management
关键词 认购权证 Black—Scholes模型 EGARCH模型 “低于价格下限”之谜 套利 call warrant Black-Scholes model EGARCH model pricing biases arbitrage
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1[1]MITCHELL T.China Warrants Market Is Biggest[N].The Financial Times,2007-01-04.
  • 2[2]KREMER R,ROENFELDT O.Warrant Pricing:Jump-diffusion vs.Black-Scholes[J].Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1993,28(2):255~272.
  • 3[3]SCHULZ G,TRAUTMANN S.Robustness of Option-like Warrant Valuation[J].Journal of Banking and Finance,1994,18(5):841~859.
  • 4[4]MIKAMI T.Investment Strategy:Convertible Bonds and Equity Warrants[C].Tokyo:Berkeley Program in Finance in Asia Seminar,1990.
  • 5[5]KUWAHARA H,MARSH A.The Pricing of Japanese Equity Warrant[J].Management Science,1992,38(11):1 610~1 641.
  • 6[6]VELD C.Analysis of Equity Warrants as Investment and Finance Instruments[M].Tilburg:Tilburg University Press,1992.
  • 7[7]SUNTI T.Warrant Pricing by Using Constant Elasticity Model,an Empirical Study in Thailand[R].Bangkok:Chulalongkorn University,2005.
  • 8[8]林海,郑振龙,彭博.股票波动率模型与认股权证定价[Z].厦门:厦门大学经济学院,2005.
  • 9[9]YUAN X Y,FAN W,LIU Q.China's Securities Markets:Challenges,Innovations,and the Latest Developments[J].International Finance Review,2007,8(1):245~262.
  • 10[10]GALAI D,SCHNELLER M.Pricing of Warrants and the Value of the Firm[J].Journal of Finance,1978,47(5):80~81.

同被引文献183

引证文献11

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部