期刊文献+

企业领导者的社会责任取向、企业社会表现和组织绩效的关系研究 被引量:38

The Relation of Corporate Leaders' Social Responsibility Orientation with the Social and Organizational Performances of Corporate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 企业领导者的社会责任取向、企业社会表现和组织绩效存在一定关系。根据以往的研究,企业社会责任取向包括经济取向、法律取向、伦理取向和慈善取向4个维度。在研究中,把企业社会表现拟合为员工、消费者、股东、强制环保、自觉环保、社区和特殊群体7个因子,把组织绩效分为市场绩效、财务绩效和人力绩效3个因子。研究发现,在企业社会责任取向、企业社会表现和组织绩效3者的关系中,企业社会表现起着中介作用。此外,对国外学者设计的企业社会责任取向问卷进行了本土化,并首次将企业社会责任取向、企业社会表现和组织绩效纳入一个研究框架中。 There is certain relationship among leaders ' social responsibility orientation, social per formance and organizational performance in corporate. Corporate social responsibility orientation was divided into four factors, including economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic responsibility orientation; Corporate social performances were did into seven ones, including employee, consumer, stockholder, compulsory environmental protection, voluntary environmental protection, community and special groups; organizational performances were did into three factors, including market performance, financial performance and employee performance. The research shows that among the corporate social responsibility orientation, corporate social performance and organizational performance, the corporate social performance plays the intermediary role. On the basis of Carroll's research, the questionnaire of the corporate social responsibility orientation designed by Aupperle was localized. The corporate social responsibility orientation, corporate social performance and organizational performance were considered in a research frame.
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 2008年第3期445-453,共9页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家哲学社会科学基金资助项目(07BJY003)
关键词 CSR CSRO 企业社会表现 组织绩效 关系研究 结构方程 corporate social responsibility corporate social responsibility orientation corporatesocial performance organizational performance~ relationship study structural equation
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1[1]霍尔斯特 S,阿尔伯特 L.企业伦理学基础[M].李兆雄,译.上海:上海社会科学出版社,2001.
  • 2[2]波斯特 J E,安妮 T L,詹姆斯 W.企业与社会:公司战略公共政策与伦理[M].10版.张志强,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
  • 3[3]CARROLL A B.A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance[J].Academy of Management Review,1979,4(4):497~506.
  • 4[4]WOOD D J.Corporate Social Performance Revisited[J].Academy of Management Review,1991,16(4):691~718.
  • 5[5]BRAIN K B,JING L F,HEGARTY W H.A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation:Hong Kong VS.United States Students[J].Teaching Business Ethics,2000,4(2):151~167.
  • 6[6]AUPPERLE K E.An Empirical Inquiry into the Social Responsibility as Defined by Corporations:An Examination of Various Models and Relationships[D].Georgia:University of Georgia Business School,1982.
  • 7[7]AUPPERLE K E.The Use of Forced-Choice Survey Procedures in Assessing Corporate Social Orientation[J].Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy,1991,(12):269~279.
  • 8[8]AUPPERLE K E,SIMMONS F B.Have Ceos of Large U.S.Firms Changed Their CSR Orientations During the Reagan Presidency?[C]//The Academy of Management Meeting,NY,1989.
  • 9[9]O'NEILL H M,SAUNDERS C B,MCCARTHY A D,et al.Corporate Social Responsiveness and Profitability:Are Tradeoffs Necessary?[J].Journal of Business Ethics,1989,34(8):353~357.
  • 10[10]PINKSTON T S,CARROLL A B.A Retrospective Examination of CSR Orientations:Have They Changed?[J]Journal of Business Ethics,1996,41(6):199~206.

二级参考文献100

  • 1理查德 T 德 乔治.经济伦理学(第五版)[M].北京大学出版社,2002..
  • 2[8]卡罗尔·卡尔金斯.美国扩张与发展史话[M].北京:人民出版社,1984.
  • 3[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 4[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 5[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 6[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 7[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 8[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 9[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 10[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993

共引文献9189

同被引文献553

引证文献38

二级引证文献288

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部