期刊文献+

平台匹配技术对双边市场定价的影响 被引量:11

The Effects of the Platform Matching Technique upon Pricing of Two-sided Markets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章对双边市场中平台匹配技术在垄断平台与竞争平台下的三种定价方式的影响进行了探讨,得出平台的最优定价结果。分析结果表明:无论在垄断平台下的双边市场还是在竞争平台下的双边市场,平台采用不同的收费模式来应对不同的用户需求,其盈利本质上没有根本的区别。 This paper studies the effects of platform matching technique upon three kinds of pricing modes under the monopoly platform and competing platforms in two-sided markets. Through the study, the paper gets the optimal pricing outcomes of platforms. Based on analysis, the paper indicates that in two-sided markets under whether monopoly platform or competing platforms, distinct charging modes are applied to meet demands of different groups of customers, which makes no difference by nature in platform profit making.
出处 《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2008年第3期57-60,81,共5页 Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
关键词 匹配技术 双边市场 垄断平台 竞争平台 最优定价 matching technique two-sided markets monopoly platform competing platforms optimal pricing
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Amstrong. Competition in two-sided markets[EB/OL]. DEI, 2004.
  • 2Rochet,Tirole. Two-sided markets: an overview[EB/OL]. DEI, 2004.
  • 3Katz Shapiro. Network externalities, competition and compatibility[J]. American Economic Review, 1985,75(3):424-440.
  • 4Caillaud Jullien. Chicken and egu competition among intermediation service providel[J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 2002,24..309-328.
  • 5纪汉霖.双边市场定价方式的模型研究[J].产业经济研究,2006(4):11-20. 被引量:68
  • 6Roson,R. Two-sided markets: A tentative survey[J]. Review of Network Economics, 2005,4(2):142-160.
  • 7Gabszewicz J J Wauthy. Two-sided markets and price competition with multi-homing [EB/OL]. DEI, 2004.
  • 8Evans D. Some empirical aspects of multi-sided platform industries[J]. Review of Network Economics, 2003,2:191-209.

二级参考文献9

  • 1[1]EVANS DS.The antitrust economics of multi-sided platform markets[J].Yale Journal on Regulation,2003,20:325-381.
  • 2[2]ROCHET J-C,J TIROLE.Platform competition in two-sided markets[J].Journal of European Economic Association,2003,1:990-1029.
  • 3[3]ARMSTRONG M.Competition in two-sided markets[EB/OL].IDEI,2004.
  • 4[4]HAGIU A.Two-sided platforms:pricing and social efficiency[EB/OL].IDEI,2005.
  • 5[5]CAILLAUD B,B JULLIEN.Chicken & egg:competition among intermediation service providers[J].Rand Journal of Economics,2002,24:309-328.
  • 6[6]HAGIU A.Optimal pricing and commitment in two-sided markets[EB/OL].IDEI,2004.
  • 7[7]ARMSTRONG M,J WRIGHT.Two-sided markets with multi-homing exclusive contracts[EB/OL].IDEI,2004.
  • 8[8]GABSZEWICZ J J,X Y WAUTHY.Two-sided markets and price competition with multihoming[EB/OL].IDEI,2004.
  • 9[9]ROCHET J-C,J TIROLE.Two-sided markets:an overview[EB/OL].IDEI,2004.

共引文献67

同被引文献103

引证文献11

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部