期刊文献+

浅析海牙《协议选择法院公约》对国际商事仲裁的影响

The Impact of Hague Agreement of Conventional Choosing Court in International Commercial Arbitration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前我们面临着这样一种境况:尽管是各个国家造就了国际法,各国的法院又代表着国家的主权,但这些法院的判决并未能在国际范围内得到广为承认和执行。相反,只有司法庭,即仲裁庭的裁决才能在执行地国法院的协助下在全球多数国家得到执行。海牙《协议选择法院公约》的出台是否能改变这一境况,公约起草者们设立的与国际商事仲裁体制竞争的目标能否实现,其对国际商事仲裁将产生怎样的影响,将是本文探讨的重心。 Now we are confronted with such a situation: although each country has international law, the national court also represents national sovereignty, the court's decision at international level can not be widely recognized and enforced. On the contrary, the Arbitral Awards can be implemented with the assistance of the majority countries in the world. This essay will focus on : whether the promulgation of Hague Agreement of Conventional Choosing Court can change this situation, the aim of drafters of the agreement and how can this agreement influence the ICA.
作者 张雯
机构地区 郑州大学法学院
出处 《吉林省经济管理干部学院学报》 2008年第2期53-56,共4页 Journal of Jilin Province Economic Management Cadre College
关键词 《协议选择法院公约》 《纽约公约》 承认与执行 Agreement of Conventional Choosing Court ICA Recognization and enforcement
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1王传忠,苗乐平,常晶.对外贸易与国际商事仲裁[J].沈阳工业大学学报,2001,23(S1):151-153. 被引量:6
  • 2王一平.国际商事仲裁制度对国际社会和现代国际法的影响[J].政法论坛,1999,17(6):116-119. 被引量:1
  • 3[1]杨良宜.国际商事仲裁[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997.
  • 4[1]Bagner H. Confidentiality-A Fundamental Principle in International Commercial Arbitration[J]. Journal of International Arbitration, 2001,18(2): 243-249.
  • 5[2]Smit H. Breach of Confidentiality as a Ground for Avoidance of the Arbitration Agreement[J]. American Review of International Arbitration, 2000.
  • 6[3]Fortier L Y. The Occasionally Unwarranted Assumption of Confidentiality[J]. Arb Int'l,1999(15):131.
  • 7[5]Julian L. Expert Report of Dr Julian D M Lew (in Esso v Plowman)[J].Arbitration International,1995(3):285.另可参见: Ali Shipping Corporation v. Shipyard Trogir[J]. Lloyd's Rep, 1998(1):643.
  • 8[6]Ambrose C, Maxwell K. London Maritime Arbitration [M].2nd ed.2002.175.
  • 9[7]Ali Shipping Corporation v. Shipyard Trogir[J]. Lloyd's Rep, 1998(1):643.
  • 10[8]London & Estates Ltd v. Parebas Ltd[J].EG, 1995,2(2):134.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部