期刊文献+

痔上黏膜环切钉合术与Milligan—Morgan术治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度内痔2年疗效比较 被引量:16

Comparison of two-year efficacy between procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in treatment of Ⅲ and Ⅳ degree internal hemorrhoids
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较痔上黏膜环切钉合术(PPH)与Milligan—Morgan术(MMH)治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度内痔的远期疗效。方法按照完全随机分组原则将100例Ⅲ、Ⅳ度内痔患者分别采用PPH(PPH组,42例)和MMH(MMH组,58例)手术,观察并比较两组患者术后的远期疗效差异。结果PPH组与MMH组术后2年比较,在出现肛门溢液(2.38%比20.69%,P=0.007)、皮赘(9.52%比25.86%,P=0.040)和细便(2.38%比18.97%,P=0.027)方面PPH组术后少见,总的并发症发生率(9.52%比25.86%,P=0.040)和总排便功能异常(9.52%比29.31%,P=0.017)方面PPH组术后也少见,两组差异有统计学意义。在痔脱垂复发(14.29%比10.34%,P=0.549)、症状改善满意度(92.86%比87.93%,P=0.636)和总的症状复发(19.05%比25.86%,P=0.424)方面两组差异无统计学意义。结论PPH与Milligan-Morgan术治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度内痔的远期疗效无显著差异,但PPH安全、并发症少、对排便功能影响小。 Objective To compare the long-term efficacy of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) in the treatment of Ⅲ and Ⅳ degree internal hemorrhoids. Methods One hundred patients were randomly divided into two groups and received PPH (n=42) and MMH (n=58) respectively. After two years, the efficacy, complications and function of defecation were compared. Results Two years after operation, the morbidities of hydrorrhea (2.38% vs 20.69%, P=0.007), dermal neoplasm formation (9.52% vs 25.86%, P= 0.040) and narrowing in the caliber of the stools (2.38% vs 18.97%, P=0.027) were significantly lower in PPH group than those in MMH group (P〈0.05). The morbidities of overall complication (9.52% vs 25.86%, P=0.040) and overall abnormal function of defecation (9.52% vs 29.31%, P= 0.017) were lower in PPH group than those in MMH group (P〈0.05). However, there were no significant differences of the morbidity of relapse (14.29% vs 10.34%, P=0.549), patient satisfactory degree (92.86% vs 87.93%, P=0.636) and overall symptom recurrence rate (19.05% vs 25.86%, P=0.424) between the two groups. Conclusions Long-term efficacies of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of Ⅲ and Ⅳ degree internal hemorrhoids are similar. PPH has better safety, less complications and less effect on abnormal function of defecation compared with MMH.
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS 2008年第3期249-252,共4页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
关键词 痔上黏膜环切钉合术 Milligan—Morgan术 治疗效果 Hemorrhoids Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1痔临床诊治指南(2006版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463. 被引量:2094
  • 2Brian JM, John RTM, John EH. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan hameorrhoidectomy : randomizedcontrolled trial. Lancet, 2000,355 : 782-785.
  • 3Ho YH, Gheong WK, Tsang C, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy cost and effectiveness:randomized, controlled trim including inccontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum, 2000,43 : 1666-1675.
  • 4Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingwav DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled hemorr-hoidectomy) versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy : randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2000, 355 : 779-781.
  • 5Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K, et al. A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg, 2002,137: 1395-1401.
  • 6杨新庆,王振军.修订痔诊治暂行标准会议纪要[J].中华外科杂志,2003,41(9):698-699. 被引量:210
  • 7姚礼庆,唐竞,孙益红,戈少云,陆维琪,刘厚宝,张波.经吻合器治疗重度痔的临床应用价值(附36例报告)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2001,21(5):288-289. 被引量:320
  • 8Milligan ETC, Morgan CN, Jones LE, et al. Surgical anatomy of the analcanal, and the operation treatment of hemorrhoids. lancet, 1937,233 : 1119-1224.
  • 9Nisar PJ, Scholefield JH. Clinical review : managing haemorrhoids. Br Med J, 2003,327 : 845-851.
  • 10兰平,周旭毓,吴小剑,汪建平.吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术与Milligan-Morgan术的安全性和有效性随机对照研究的系统评价[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2004,7(4):262-266. 被引量:18

二级参考文献43

  • 1中华医学会外科学分会肛肠外科学组.痔临床诊治指南(草案)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2004,7(5):415-416. 被引量:206
  • 2陈道达 熊叔陶 齐文泰.痔环状切除术的改进[J].中华外科杂志,1979,17:498-499.
  • 3Longo A.Treatment of haemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device:a new procedure.Bologna:Monduzzi Editore.Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery,1998.777-784.
  • 4Ho YH,Cheong WK,Tsang C,et al.Stapled hemorrhoidectomy-cost and effectiveness.Randomized,controlled trial including incontinence scoring,anorectal manometry,and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months.Dis Colon Rectum,2000,43:1666-1675.
  • 5Lloyd D,Ho KS,Seow-Choen F.Modified Longo's hemorrhoidecto-my.Dis Colon Rectum,2002,45:416-417.
  • 6Jayne DG,Seow-Choen F.Modified stapled hemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of massive circumferentially prolapsing piles.Tech Coloproctol,2002,6:191-193.
  • 7Law WL, Chu KW. Triple rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids:prospective, randomized trial of use of local anesthetic injection.Dis Colon Rectum, 1999, 42: 363-366.
  • 8Mehigan B J, Monson JR, Harlley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy:randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2000, 355: 782-785.
  • 9Thomson WH. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg, 1975, 62:542-552.
  • 10Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhodial prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceeding of 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, 1998. 777-784.

共引文献2644

同被引文献118

引证文献16

二级引证文献164

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部