期刊文献+

不同抗性小麦品种叶部真菌区系分析 被引量:4

Study on the Fungiflora Resistance to in Wheat Leaf with Different Wheat Leaf Blight
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对抗、感叶枯病小麦品种不同生育时期叶部的附生和内生真菌区系进行了系统分析.结果表明,每个品种都有自己独特的叶部真菌区系,抗病和感病品种叶部附生真菌区系差异不大,但内生真菌区系组成则有明显不同,一般感病品种内生真菌种类多于抗病品种.研究结果还发现,小麦内生真菌种数明显多于附生真菌.小麦叶部内生真菌优势属主要为链格孢属(Alternaria spp.)、青霉属(Penicillum spp.)和曲霉属(Aspergillus spp.);附生真菌优势属多为木霉属(Trichoderma spp.)和镰刀菌属(Fusarium spp.).生育时期对小麦叶部真菌区系组成具有较大影响,随生育时期延长,叶部附生和内生的真菌种类也不断增多. The leaf endophytic and adnascent fungiflora of wheat cultivars with different resistance to leaf blight was analyzed in different living-stages. The results indicate that there is a particular endophytic and adnascent fungiflora for every wheat cultivar. There isn' t huge difference in adnascent fungiflora between resistant and susceptible cultivars, but remarkable difference in endophytic fungiflora, and there are more endophytic species than adnascent ones. The dominant species Of the endophytic fungi of wheat leaves are Alternaria spp. , Penicillum spp. and Aspergillus spp. , but those of the adnascent fungi are Trichoderma spp. and Fusarium spp. Moreover, the composing of the endophytic and adnascent fungiflora is variational constantly in the different living-stage, and there are more and more species with the development of wheat leaf generally.
出处 《河南农业大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期216-219,共4页 Journal of Henan Agricultural University
基金 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划重大项目(2006BAD02A07-1) 河南省教育厅自然科学研究项目(2007210018)
关键词 小麦 叶枯病 内生真菌 附生真菌 区系分析 wheat leaf blight endophytic fungi adnascent fungi fungiflora analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献56

  • 1陈功友,郑铁民,任国兰,时向阳,郭艳春,宋爱仙.不同生态条件下苹果叶面附生物种群演替的初步研究[J].生态学杂志,1993,12(4):7-13. 被引量:5
  • 2陈卫良,徐平,龚鸿飞,李德葆.Enterobacter cloacae B8x在水稻叶部定殖及防治水稻白叶枯病的研究[J].农业生物技术学报,1994,2(2):61-66. 被引量:14
  • 3徐同,R.van Peer,H.Rattink,B.Schippers.萤光假单胞细菌根部定殖对水培系统中香石竹镰刀菌枯萎病的作用[J].植物病理学报,1989,19(3):179-184. 被引量:6
  • 4[1]DEACON J M. Rhizosphere constraints affecting Biocontrol organisms applied to seeds. In: Seed treatment: prospects and progress BCPC Monograph 57 [M]. Thornton Health: British Crop Protection Council, 1994.315-327.
  • 5[2]WHIPPS J M. Developments in the biological control of soil-brone plant pathogens [J]. Advances in Botanical Research, 1997(26): 1-134.
  • 6[3]KEEL C, DEFAGO G. Interactions between beneficial soil bacteria and root pathogens: mechanisms and ecological impact[A]. In: Gange AC, Brown VK, eds. Multitrophic Interactions in Terrestrial System [C]. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1997. 27-47.
  • 7[5]CRONIN D, MOENNE-LOCCOZ Y, FENTON A. Ecological interaction of a biocontrol Pesudomonas fluorescens strain producing 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol with the soft rot potato pathogen Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica [J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology,1997(23): 95-106.
  • 8[6]VICEDO B, ASINS M J, LOPEZ M M. Spontaneous transfer of the Ti plasmid of A. radiobacter strain K84 in crown gall tissue [J]. Phytopathology ,1996(86): 528-534.
  • 9[7]JONES D A, RYDER M H, CLARE B G. Construction of a Tra- delection mutant of pAgK84 to safeguard the biological control of crown gall [J]. Molecular and General Genetics, 1988(212): 207-214.
  • 10[8]MARILLEY L, ARAGNO M. Phytogenetic diversity of bacterial communities differing in degree of proximity of Lolium perenne and Trifolium repens roots [J]. Applied Soil Ecology,1999(13): 127-136.

共引文献81

同被引文献40

引证文献4

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部