期刊文献+

中国诉讼分流的数据分析 被引量:71

Data Analysis of Litigation Diversion in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 改革开放以来,中国诉讼数量迅速增长,但1997年以后诉讼增长率明显降低。对于社会转型期诉讼增长率不升反降的原因,可以从非诉讼纠纷解决机制、司法政策和法院公信力三个方面来分析纠纷的走向。关于诉讼与非诉讼纠纷解决机制的年均增长率、相关系数和比重的数据分析表明,中国诉讼增长率的下降也伴随着人民调解和经济仲裁作用的下降,行政解决机制的增强、不受理的司法政策、诉讼费用改革以及针对司法腐败的一系列制度性建设,遏制了诉讼量的快速增长。 Following reform and opening up,China witnessed a rapid increase in litigation,but the rate of increase has undergone a marked decline since 1997.The reasons this has occurred in a period of social transformation are threefold:a non-litigious dispute-solving mechanism,judicial policy and the credibility of the courts.A data analysis of the average annual rate of increase,the coefficient of correlation,and the respective proportions of litigious and non-litigious dispute-solving mechanisms indicates that the slowing of the rate of increase of litigation has been accompanied by a decrease in the role of the people's mediation and economic arbitration.The rapid increase of lawsuits has been curbed by enhancement of the administrative dispute-solving mechanism,a non-acceptance judicial policy,the reform of legal fees and a series of institution-building measures targeting judicial corruption.
作者 朱景文
出处 《中国社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第3期79-94,共16页 Social Sciences in China
基金 “中国法律发展报告--数据库和指标体系”课题 教育部重大攻关课题“多元化纠纷解决机制与和谐社会的建构”(05JZD0004).
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1朱景文主编.《中国法律发展报告--数据库和指标体系》.第6-8页.
  • 2Robert Kagan, “The Routinization of Debt Collection: An Essay on Social Change and Conflict in the Courts, ” Lawand Society Review, vol. 18, no. 3, 1984, p. 323.
  • 3Lane Kenworthy, Stewart Macaulay and Joel Rogers, “‘The More Things Change... ' : Business Litigation and Governance in the American Automobile Industry,”Law and Social Inquiry, vol. 21, no. 3 (Summer 1996), pp. 631-678.
  • 42006年最高人民法院工作报告.
  • 5《中国统计年鉴》(2007).北京:中国统计出版社,2008年.第60页表3-4.
  • 6王亚新.《纠纷,秩序,法治--探索研究纠纷处理与规范形成的理论框架》[J].清华法律评论(北京:清华大学出版社),1999,2.
  • 7棚濑孝雄.《纠纷的解决与审判制度》.王亚新译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994年.
  • 8Thomas Stipanowich, “ADR and the‘Vanishing Trial': The Growth and Impact of the ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution' ,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 1, no. 3 (November 2004), p. 843.
  • 9Lawrence Friedman, "General Theory of Law and Social Change, " in Jacob S. Ziegel, ed. , Law and Social Change, Toronto: York University, 1973, pp. 17-35.
  • 10季卫东.判决书“市场化”忧思[J].财经,2006,0(17):102-103. 被引量:4

共引文献14

同被引文献962

引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部