期刊文献+

平衡秤任务复杂性的事前与事后分析 被引量:5

Prior Analysis and Post Hoc Analysis on the Complexity of the Balance Scale Task
下载PDF
导出
摘要 任务复杂性的分析和评估是心理测量学和认知心理学都非常关注的重要主题。以264名小学四、五、六年级儿童为被试,平衡秤任务为研究材料,考察任务在未旋转时第一个因素上的载荷(事后分析)能否作为评价任务复杂性的一个指标,以及关系-表征复杂性模型对平衡秤任务复杂性分析(事前分析)的有效性两个问题。结果表明:平衡秤任务施测后所得所有项目的因素载荷与其难度之间没有显著正相关,即因素载荷的高低没有反映平衡秤任务复杂性的大小;而基于关系-表征复杂性模型对任务的事前分析所确定的任务等级复杂性和知识经验对任务难度的解释率为95.0%,可见,关系-表征复杂性模型提供的分析任务复杂性的思路和方法是较为合理的。 The aims of this study were to explore if the loadings on the first un-rotated factor can be taken as a way to evaluate the task complexity of the balance scale task and to explore the validity of the prior analysis on the balance scale task based on the Relational-Representational Complexity Model. 264 children from grade 4, 5 and 6 were presented with a computerized balance scale task. There were 51 items and six item types, including weight problems, distance problems, weight distance problems, conflict weight problems, conflict distance problems, and conflict balance problems. Results showed that : ( 1 ) the loadings of all balance scale items on the first un-rotated factor and the difficulty of those items had no significant positive relation. It might be that task complexity could be quantified by the loadings on the first un-rotated factor only when the difficulty of task was moderate. (2) The analysis of task complexity based on the Relational-Representational Complexity Model could predict task difficulty (R^2 = 0.95), which indicated that the model was valid in analyzing the complexity of the balance scale task.
作者 张丽 辛自强
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期46-53,共8页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30500162)
关键词 关系-表征复杂性模型 任务复杂性 任务难度 因素分析 Relational-Representational Complexity Model task complexity task difficulty factor analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Crawford J D. Intelligence, task complexity, and the distinction between automatic and effortful mental processing. In H A Rowe (Ed.),Intelligence recunception and measure, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1991, 120- 144.
  • 2Stankov L, Crawford J D. Ingredients of c.mplexity in fluid intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences, 1993, 5(2): 73- 111.
  • 3Raykuv T, Stankov L. On task complexity and "simplex" correlation matrices. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1993, 45:81 - 87.
  • 4Stankov L. The complexity effect phenomenon is an epiphenomenon of age - related fluid intelligence decline. Personality anti Individual Differences, 1994, 16(2) : 265 - 288.
  • 5Stankov L, Raykov T. Modeling complexity and difficulty in measures of fluid intelligence. Structural Equation Modeling, 1995, 2 (4): 335 - 366.
  • 6Stankov L. Complexity, metacognilion, and fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 1999, 28(2) : 121 - 143.
  • 7Arend I, Coloro R, Botella J, el al. Quantifying cognitive complexity: evidence from a reasoning task. Personality and Individual Differences, 2003, 35: 659-669.
  • 8辛自强.关系-表征复杂性模型的检验[J].心理学报,2003,35(4):504-513. 被引量:42
  • 9辛自强.问题解决和知识建构.北京:教育科学出版社,2002.
  • 10辛自强.问题解决中图式与策略的关系:来自表征复杂性模型的说明[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1344-1348. 被引量:18

二级参考文献24

  • 1辛自强,俞国良.学习不良儿童研究的社会认知取向[J].心理科学,2001,24(5):544-548. 被引量:23
  • 2Kintsch W, Greeno J G. Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychological Review, 1985, 92:109-129
  • 3Greeno J G. Some examples of cognitive task analysis with instructional implication. In: R E Snow, P Federico, W E Montagu (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction.Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.1980, 1-21
  • 4Verschaffel L, De Corte E, Pauwels A. Solving compare problems: An eye movement test of Lewis and Mayer' s consistency hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology,1992, 84(1): 85-94
  • 5De Corte E, Verschaffel L. Children's solution processes in elementary arithmetic problems: Analysis and improvement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981, 6: 765-779
  • 6Ceci S J. On bio-ecological treatise on intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall,1990, 93-153
  • 7Rittle-Johnson B, Siegler R S, Alibali M W. Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2001, 93(2): 346-362
  • 8Lewis A, Mayer R E. Students' miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problem. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1987, 79: 363~371
  • 9Commons M L, Trudeau E J, Stein S A, Richards F A. Hierarchical complexity of tasks shows the existence of developmental stages. Developmental Review, 1998, 18: 237~278
  • 10Halford G S, Wilson W H, Phillips S. Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1998, 21(6): 803~831

共引文献51

同被引文献68

引证文献5

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部