期刊文献+

合作学习小组的认知风格对其问题解决的影响 被引量:23

The Influence of Cognitive Style in Cooperative Learning Group to It's Problem Solving
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究以认知风格为依据,将合作学习小组分为场依存同质组、场独立同质组及异质组,通过小组对开放问题以及逻辑问题的解决,考察不同认知风格个体、不同类型小组的问题解决水平。结果表明:(1)个体认知风格的作用依任务性质不同而不同。(2)异质组中存在的个体之间的差异会成为有效沟通合作的障碍,进而影响异质组的问题解决水平,影响程度受到问题本身对沟通合作要求程度的影响。(3)异质分组能更好解决开放性问题。 307 participants were divided into homogeneous field dependent group, homogeneous field independent group and heterogeneous group by the cognitive style of individual. The problem solving level of individual and group were investigated in two kinds of problem setting: open-end problem setting and reasoning problem setting. The results are as follows: (1) The field independent individuals open-end problem solving level were significant better than that of field dependent individuals, but there is no significance between field dependent individuals and field independent individuals in reasoning problem solving level. (2) The diversity between individuals in cooperative group was the obstacle of group members, and that would influence the problem solving level. To which degree the diversity would influence the problem solving dependent on how much communication and collaboration did the problem itself need. (3) Compare to reasoning problem solving, heterogeneous group do better in open-end problem solving.
作者 王静 陈英和
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期102-107,共6页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 全国教育科学规划国家重点项目(ABA050001) 国家自然科学基金项目(30770729) 北京市哲学社会科学规划项目(06BaJY010)
关键词 合作学习 认知风格 问题解决水平 cooperative learning cognitive style problem solving
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Melser A N. Gifted students and cooperative learning: A study of grouping strategies. Roeper Review, 1999, 21(4) :315.
  • 2Webber S S, Donahueh L M. lnlpact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Managenlent. 2001,27 : 141 - 162.
  • 3Bowers C A, Pharnler J A, Salas E. When member holnogeneity is needed in work teams. Small Group Research, 2000, 31(3): 306- 327.
  • 4Bunderson J S, Suteliffe K M. Contparing alternative conceptualization of fouctional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effect. Academy of Management Journal, 2002,45 ( 5 ) : 875 - 893.
  • 5Harrison D A, Price K H. Time, teams, and task perfotynance: changing effects of surface and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Acadenry of Managemeng Journal. 2002, 45(5) : 1029 - 1045.
  • 6Witkin tt A, Goodenough D R. Field depndence and interpersonal behavior. Psychological Bulletin. 1977,84:661- 689.
  • 7Witkin It A, Goodenough D R. Cognitive styles: Essence and origins. New York: International Universities Press, 1981 : 1 - 141.
  • 8Stoyanov S, Kirschner P. Effect of oroblem solving support and cognitive styles on idea generation: hnplieations for technology-enhanced learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education.2007, 40( 1 ) : 49 - 63.
  • 9Halfhill T. Sundstrom E, Lahner J. Group personality composition and group effectiveness. Small Group Research, 2005, 36( 1 ) : 83 - 105.
  • 10Priola V, Smith J, Armstrong S J. Group work and cognitive style. Small Group Research, 2004, 35(5) :565 - 595.

同被引文献203

引证文献23

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部