期刊文献+

仲裁理念探析 被引量:2

Exploration and Analysis of the Idea of Arbitration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 与诉讼相比,仲裁有其自身独特的优越性,基于这种优势,支持仲裁的理念正在成为共识;而契约自由原则通常能够最大限度的发挥仲裁的优越性并贯彻支持仲裁的政策。一种实用主义思维进路为我们解决诸如仲裁性质的定位、原则与政策关系的平衡等问题提供了新的启示。 A variety of problems in present commercial arbitration system of China originate mainly from lack of correct idea supporting the system. Answers to how to realize the advantages of arbitration and develop them are the keys to those problems. Due to the advantages of resolving disputes through arbitration, the idea of favoring arbitration is becoming a common view. And in general, insisting on the principle of freedom of contract can develop arbitration-s advantages best and is conducive to the implementation of the policy favoring arbitration. The foregoing analysis reflects a pragmatistic approach. That pragmatistic ap- proach provides us with new inspiration about such issues as the nature of arbitration, the relationship between principle and policy, etc. and perhaps makes many problems nagging us not problems any longer.
作者 丁颖
出处 《江苏社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第3期107-112,共6页 Jiangsu Social Sciences
关键词 仲裁理念 支持仲裁 契约自由 实用主义 idea of arbitration favoring arbitration freedom of contract pragmatism
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Lueille M. Ponte & Thomas D. Cavenagh, Mternative Dispute Resolution in Business 183 (1999).
  • 2Roger S. Haydock, Civil Justice and Dispute Resolution in the Twenty-First Century: Mediation and Arbitration Now and for the Future, 27 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 745, 765-67 (2000).
  • 3宋连斌.《理念走向规则:仲裁法修订应注意的几个问题》,载《北京仲裁》第52辑,[北京]法律出版社2004年版,第2页.
  • 4United Paperworkers Int'l Union v. Misco, Inc., 484 U.S. 29, 38 (1987).
  • 5陈建.《国际商事调解和仲裁发展的新动向--联合国贸法会仲裁工作组第32届会议简况及其他》[J].仲裁与法律,2000,:52-52.
  • 6韩健.仲裁协议中关于仲裁机构的约定——兼评我国仲裁法中有关条款的规定[J].法学评论,1997,15(4):31-35. 被引量:22
  • 7王小莉.《论仲裁制度的诉讼化》,载《仲裁研究》第五辑,[北京]法律出版社2005年版,第31页.
  • 8Burchell v. Marsh, 58 U.S. 344 (1855).
  • 9Pieter Sanders, Quo Vadis Arbitration? Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice 7 (1999).
  • 10丁颖.论当事人对仲裁裁决司法审查范围的合意变更[J].法学评论,2006,24(5):37-43. 被引量:6

二级参考文献30

  • 1Pieter Sanders, Quo Vadis Arbitration? - Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice - A Comparative Study,Kluwer Law International, 1999, pp. 320 - 322.
  • 2Pieter Sanders, Quo Vadis Arbitration? - Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice - A Comparative Study,Kluwer Law International, 1999 ,p. 323.
  • 3James B. Hamlin, Contractual Alteration of the Scope of Judicial Review: The US Experience, 15 J. Int'l Arb. 47(1998).
  • 4Carlos J. Bianchi, Significant Recent Developments in U. S. Arbitration Law, 19 J. Inti Arb. 349 (2002).
  • 5584 F. Supp. 240 (S.D.N.Y. 1984).
  • 664 F. 3d 993 (5th Cir. 1995).
  • 7130 F. 3d 884 (9th Cir. 1997).
  • 8IOF. Supp. 2d53 (D. Mass. 1998).
  • 9935 F. 2d 1501, 1505 (7th Cir. 1991).
  • 10148 F. 3d 992 (8th Cir. 1998).

共引文献28

同被引文献28

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部