湖南省2001-2006年学校卫生经常性监督合格率情况动态分析

Dynamic Analysis on Qualification Rates of School Health Surveillance Items in Hunan Province from 2001 Through 2006

目的分析湖南省2001-2006年学校卫生经常性监督合格率情况的变化,为开展学校卫生监督提供依据。方法对来源于湖南省各市州卫生监督机构2001-2006年各年上报的年报表进行统计分析。结果2001-2006年,学校卫生经常性监督合格率为58.65%。学校卫生经常性监督分项合格情况,教室人均面积、课桌椅、黑板、教室照明、教室微小气候、环境噪音、厕所、生活饮用水、学校食品卫生、传染病管理的合格率分别为55.76%、41.89%、53.94%、54.31%、51.75%、51.99%、44.56%、59.38%、57.22%、49.39%。从2001-2006年,教室人均面积、课桌椅、黑板、教室照明、厕所、生活饮用水、学校传染病管理经常性监督合格率均是市高于县,中学高于小学;教室微小气候县高于市,小学高于中学;环境噪音县高于市,中学高于小学;学校食品卫生市高于县,而中小学无差异。结论尽快修订《学校卫生工作条例》,争取各级政府领导的重视与支持,多部门协调配合,加大对学校卫生尤其是农村中小学校的卫生监督力度,使学校的卫生设施符合要求,学校卫生经常性监督合格率才能大幅度提高。

Objective To analyze the qualified rates in routine supervised school health items in Hunan Province from 2001 to 2006, and to provide evidences for improving health supervision in schools. Method The check - up data of school health supervision reported by city or prefecture grade institutes of health supervision in Hunan Province from 2001 to 2006 were collected to perform statistical analysis. Results The qualified rate of routine supervision items was .58.6.5% during the period of 2001 - 2006. And the qualified rates of the per capita space in the classroom, desk and chair, blackboard, illumination, tiny climate of classroom, environment noise, toilet, drinking water, food hygiene, and infectious disease control were55.76%, 41.89%, 53.94%, 54.31%, 51.75%, 51.99%, 44.56%, .59.38%, 57.22%, and49.39%. From 2001 to 2006, urban areas and middle schools had higher qualified rates of the per capita space in the classroom, desk and chair, blackboard, illumination, toilet, drinking water, and infectious disease control than those in rural areas and primary schools. Rural areas and primary schools had higher qualified rate of classroom tiny climate than that in urban areas and middle schools. Rural areas and middle schools had higher qualified rate of environment noise than that in urban areas and primary schools. Urban areas had higher qualified rate of food hygiene than that in rural areas, but there was no difference between primary schools and middle schools. Conclusions The results suggest that it is necessary for the government to revise the Working Regulation of School Health and to pay more attention on school health supervision. All the departments should strengthen and improve school health supervision, especially in primary schools and middle schools of rural areas.