非对称管制下垄断企业R&D投入决策研究:价格竞争模型被引量：7

R&D Investment Decision of Regulated Firms under Asymmetric Regulation:A Price Competition Model

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文旨在探讨非对称价格管制对于双寡头市场上企业R&D投入决策的影响。通过构造无管制基准,对不同管制环境下价格竞争的均衡解进行分析,结果发现,非对称价格管制会对企业的R&D投入产生影响,政府许可的价格下调幅度δ的大小决定了影响的方向:(1)当δ足够大时,在位企业和新企业都会增加R&D投入;(2)当δ较小时,在位企业会选择减少R&D投入,而新企业决策者仍会选择增大R&D投入力度。 This paper investigates the effect of asymmetric price regulation on R＆D investment in a duopoly market. Setting a non - regulatory （or symmetric regulation） benchmark, I analyze the equilibrium and give a comparison between R＆D investment level under different regulatory environments. The results show that, asymmetric regulation does affect R＆D investment, and the direction is dependent of the approved discount rate of price （marked Delta） stipulated by the government. Firstly, when in the condition a higher enough Delta, both incumbent firm and new entrant will increase their R＆D investment. Secondly, in the condition of a lower Delta, while incumbent firm decrease R＆D investment, new entrants enhances his R＆D investment as well.

作者刘新梅张若勇徐润芳

机构地区西安交通大学管理学院

出处《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 2008年第2期80-84,共5页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

基金国家自然基金项目资助(70473071) 西安交通大学"985工程"<人口与经济社会可持续发展的政策与管理创新研究基地>资助项目

关键词 R&D 非对称管制双寡头垄断价格竞争 R＆D asymmetric regulation duopoly market price competition

分类号 F204 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1Roberts P. Product innovation, product-market competition and persistent profitability in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(7) :655 - 670.
2Kamien Morton I, Schwartz Nancy L. Market structure and innovation: a survey[J]. Journal of Economics Literature, 1975, 13 (1):1 -37.
3Claude D'Aspremont, Alexis Jacquemin. Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers[J]. American Economic Review, 1988, 78(5): 1133- 1137.
4De bondt R, Henriques I. Strategic investment with asymmetric spillovers[J]. Canadian Journal of Economics, 1995, 26(3) :656 - 674.
5Amir M, Amir R,Jin J. Sequencing R&D decisions in a two-period duopoly with spillovers [J].Economic Theory. 2000, 15 : 1034 - 1057.
6袁锋,陈晓剑,吴开亚.基于产品差异化的企业R&D合作策略分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2004,21(10):57-61. 被引量：17
7杨勇,达庆利.不对称双寡头企业技术创新投资决策研究[J].中国管理科学,2005,13(4):95-99. 被引量：35
8Cook K, Shortell SM, Conrad DA, et al. A theory of organization response to regulation: the case of hospitals [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1983, 8(2) : 193 - 205.
9王俊豪.政府管制经济学导论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003.
10张昕竹.我国电信管制改革七大悬念[J].信息网络,2002(4):7-13. 被引量：1

二级参考文献19

1杨勇,达庆利.企业产品升级投资决策研究[J].中国管理科学,2005,13(1):65-70. 被引量：7
2Galbmith J K, American Capitalism [M], Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1952.
3Kamin M I, Muller E, Zang I, Research joint ventures and R & D cartels, American Economic Review, 1992, 82 (5): 1293-1307.
4Katz M, Ordover J, R & D cooperation and competition [J], Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics, 1990: 137-191.
5Teece D. Competition, cooperation and innovation [J], Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1992, 18: 1-25.
6D' Aspremont C, Jacquemin A, Cooperative and noncooperative R & D in duopoly with spillovers[J], American Economic Review, 1988, 78: 1133-1137.
7Suzumura K. Cooperative and Noncooperative R &D in Oligopoly with Spillovers [J], American Economic Review, 1992, 82: 1307-1320.
8Poyago & Theotoky J A, Equilibrium and Optimal Size of a Research Joint Venture in an Oligopoly with Spillovers [J], The Journal of Industrial Economics, 1995, 43: 209-226.
9Grenadier S R, Weiss A M. Investment in technological innovations: An option pricing approach[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1997,44(3) :397 - 416.
10Farzin Y H,Huisman K J M,et al. Optimal timing of technology adoption [ J ] .Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1998,22(5) :779 - 799.