期刊文献+

平片法无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的体会 被引量:4

The Experience of Inguinal Hernia Treated by Lichtenstein on Tension-free Hernioplasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:总结应用补片加强腹股沟后壁的平片法无张力疝修补术的临床效果。方法:采用平片法无张力疝修补即在疝囊高位结扎后在精索后方置入合适补片修补腹股沟管后壁。结果:33例病人术后5-7d痊愈出院,无并发症,随诊无一例复发。结论:平片法无张力疝修补术有无张力、复发率低、痛苦少、操作简单、费用低、并发症少等优点,是良好的修补腹股沟疝的手术方式。 Objective :To summarize the clinical effect of lichtenstein on tension -free hemioplasty in strengthening back wall of inquinal canal. Method: Lichtenstein on tension - free hernioplasty means using lichtenstein to repair back wall. Result: a total of 33 cases were cured 'after 5 to 7 days. and the recurrences not occured. Conelusion:Lichtenstein tension -free herioplasty in treating inguinal hernia has some advan- tage of tension - free, no recurrences and less injury, quick and seldom complication.
出处 《河北医学》 CAS 2008年第6期720-721,共2页 Hebei Medicine
关键词 腹股沟疝 无张力疝修补术 平片法 Inguinal hernia Tension -free inguinal hernia repair Lichtenstein
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

  • 1Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ, Englund T, Westman B,Anderberg B. Temion-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus meshplug versus Lichtemtein: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg. , 2003; 237(1) : 142-147.
  • 2Sarli L, Pietra N, Choua O, Costi R, Thenasseril B, Giunta A. Prospective randomised comparative study ofhparoscopic hernioplasty and Lichtenstein tension-free hemioplasty (Italian) [J ]. Aeta Biomed Ateneo Parrnense, 1997 ; 68( 1 -2) :5 - 10.
  • 3Paganini AM, Lezoche E, Carle F, Carlei F, Favretti F, Feliciotti F,Gesuita K, Guerrieri M, Lomanto D, Nardovino M, Panti M,Ribichini P, Sarli L, Sottili M, Tamburini A, Taschieri A. A randomized, controlled, clinical study of laparoscopic vs open tensionfree hernia repair[J]. Surg Endose,1998; 12(7) : 979 -986.
  • 4Heikkinen T, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A. A cost and outcome comparison between laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernia operations in a day-case unit[J]. Surg Endosc, 1998; 12(10): 1 199-1 203.
  • 5Aitola P, Airo I, Mafikalnen M. Laparoscopic versus open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A prospective randomised trial [J ]. Ann Chir, 1998; 87(1): 22-25.
  • 6Koemnger JS, Oster M, Butters M. Management of inguinal hernia: a comparison of current methods (German) [J]. Chirurg, 1998; 69(12):1 340-1 344.
  • 7Zieren J, Zieren HU, Said S, Wenger FA, Muller JM. Prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic and open tension-flee inguinal hernia repair with Shouldice' s operation[J]. Am J Surg, 1998;175(4) : 330 -333.
  • 8Beets GL, Dirksen CD, Go PM, Geisler FE, Baeten CG, Kootstra G. Open or laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia? A randomized controlled trial[J]. Surg Enclose, 1999; 13(4) : 323 -327.
  • 9Johansson B, Hallerbaoeck B, Glise H, Anesten B, Smedberg S, Roman J. Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair. A randomized multicenter trial (SCULL hernia repair study) [J ]. Ann Surg, 1999 ; 230(2) : 225 -231.
  • 10Sarli L, lusco DR, Sansebastiano G, Costi R. Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernias: a prospective, randomized study of open,tension-free versus laparoscopic approach [J ]. Surgical Laparoscopy,EndoscoFy&Percutaneous Techniques, 2001; 11 (4): 262-267.

共引文献297

同被引文献11

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部