期刊文献+

从Peoples看罗尔斯对国家是理性行为体的批判

The "Peoples" and Rawls' Criticism of States as Rational Actors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大多数国际关系理论流派都把国家作为理性的行为体,然而罗尔斯在其晚年的著作《万民法》中却拒绝把国家作为国际关系分析的单元,而把人民(Peoples)作为国际关系的行为主体,因为后者既是理性的、又是合理性的。但是从罗尔斯对世界国家的分类以及人民同非人民社会的关系来看,人民和国家之间的差别并不大,这说明如何体现出国家的合理性仍然是一个难题。 Most international relation theories hold states as rational actors, but Rawls refuses to use them as the units of international analysis, for, to him, Peoples as rational as well as reasonable actors. Rawls divides the world into five types, and evaluates the relationship between Peoples and non - Peoples. It seems that Peoples are not so different from states, and this means it is still a problem how to display the reasonableness of states.
作者 刘贺青
出处 《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2008年第3期18-22,共5页 Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 南京大学"985工程"哲学社会科学创新基地"经济全球化与国际关系"项目成果
关键词 Peoples 罗尔斯 国家 理性 合理性 Peoples Rawls states rationality reasonableness
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1[1]Chris B.International Relations Theory:New Normative Approaches[M].New York; Columbia University Press,1992:10.
  • 2[2]约翰·罗尔斯.作为公平的正义:正义新论[M].姚大志,译.上海:三联书店,2003:476.
  • 3[3]John R.The Law of Peoples[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1999.
  • 4[4]Hans M,K T.Politics among Nations:the Struggle for Power and Peace[M].New York:Alfred A.Knopf,1985:13.
  • 5[5]Nicholas R.Political theory and International Relations:Promised Land or Exit from Eden[J].International Affairs,2000,76 (4):755-770.
  • 6[6]Robert J.Classical and Modern Thought on International Relations:from Anarchy to Cosmopolis[M].New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2005:159.
  • 7[7]Chris B.Proceedings of the 21st IVR World Congress[Z].Berlin (Germany):Franz Steiner Verlag Stuttgart,2004.
  • 8[8]David R.Defending Reasonability:The Centrality of Reasonability in the Later Rawls[J].Philosophy & social criticism,2004,30 (5/6):525-540.
  • 9[9]Molly C.Normative Theory in International Relations:A Pragmatic Approach[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University,1999:31.
  • 10[10]John R.Political Liberalism[M].New York:Columbia University Press,1996:49-50.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部