期刊文献+

金属裸支架与国产药物洗脱支架置入冠状动脉长病变后的血管重建及生物相容性效应 被引量:3

Revascularization and biocompatibility of domestic rapamycin drug-eluting stent versus bare metal sten in the treatment of long coronary artery lesions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比国产雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架(firebird火鸟)和金属裸支架置入冠状动脉长病变血管后的安全性、生物相容性及血管重建作用。方法:选取2005-07/2007-07抚顺矿务局总医院行支架置入治疗冠状动脉长病变(单根血管病变长度≥20mm)患者215例为观察对象。置入药物洗脱支架134例,置入金属裸支架81例。支架均由微创医疗器械(上海)有限公司提供。置入者为本科从事冠状动脉介入治疗≥10年的副主任医师。根据病变血管近端及远端血管直径,按1:1比例选择支架,支架长度以超过病变两端3-5mm为准,置入术中经动脉鞘管注入肝素5000U,术后腹壁皮下注射低分子肝素钙0.4mg共3d,大部分患者使用球囊进行预扩张。冠状动脉造影定量分析支架内或支架临近血管(5mm)管腔直径狭窄程度〉50%为血管造影再狭窄。结果:共215例患者238处靶病变完成冠状动脉造影检查随访。①术后1个月复查血常规,凝血相检查,无一例出现造血系统细胞成份、数目、形态不良改变。②随访造影显示无一例支架松脱、移位;无一例血管局部增生反应。③对影响长病变支架再狭窄因素的logistic回归分析发现,支架类型是对长病变支架内再狭窄影响最大的危险因素。④置入后6个月随访置入药物洗脱支架组再狭窄率为15.49%,置入金属裸支架组再狭窄率为47.92%,两组比较差异有显著性意义(P〈0.001),药物洗脱支架组靶病变血管重建率、置入支架后扩张的比例要明显好于金属裸支架组(P〈0.001)。结论:国产雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架(firebird火鸟)在置入冠状动脉长病变后无特殊生物相容性反应,在降低再狭窄率及血管重建方面优于金属裸支架。 AIM: To compare the safety, biocompatibility and vascular rebuilding effect of domestic rapamycin drug-eluting stent (Firebird) and bare metal stent for long coronary lesions. METHODS: From July 2005 to July 2007, 215 patients with long coronary lesions (single vascular lesion length ≥ 20 mm) undergoing stenting were selected from Mining Bureau General Hospital of Fushun. Of them, 134 cases were treated by drug-eluting stent, and 81 cases by bare metal stent. Both stents were provided by MicroPort Medical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. The surgery was performed by associate chief physician engaging in coronary intervention for more than 10 years. According to proximal and distal affected vascular diameter, stent was selected at ratio of 1:1, and stent length was 3 to 5 mm larger than two ends of lesions. All patients were given arterial sheath injection of 5 000 U heparin, and abdominal subcutaneous injection of 0.4 mg low-molecular-weight heparin calcium after surgery for 3 days. Most of the patients underwent balloon pre-expansion. Quantitative analysis of coronary angiography or vascular (5 mm) luminal diameter adjacent to stent stenosis 〉 50% was regarded as angiographic restenosis. RESULTS: 215 patients (238 target lesions) were followed-up by coronary angiography. 1.One month after surgery, blood routine and coagulation examinations showed that no adverse changes were found in cell components, number and appearance of hematopoietic system of patients. 2.Coronary angiography suggested no stent dislocation or vascular local hyperplasty in patients. 3.Logistic analysis of influential factors for long lesions showed that stent pattern was the most risk for restenosis after stenting. 4.Six months after stenting, restenosis rate of drug-eluting stent group was 15.49%, and bare metal stent group was 47.92%. There were significant differences between the two groups (P 〈 0.001). In addition, the target lesion revascularization rate and expansion ratio after stenting in drug-eluting stent group were significantly better than the bare metal stent group (P 〈 0.001). CONCLUSION: In treatment of long coronary artery disease, domestic rapamycin drug-eluting stent (firebird) shows no specific biocompatibility and it has superior effect in revascularization rate and reducing restenosis rate than bare metal stents.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第17期3209-3212,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1乔树宾,侯青,徐波,陈珏,刘海波,杨跃进,吴永健,袁晋青,吴元,戴军,尤士杰,马卫华,张沛,高展,窦克非,邱洪,慕朝伟,陈纪林,高润霖.药物洗脱支架和金属裸支架治疗弥漫病变的比较研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(6):487-491. 被引量:18
  • 2Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, et al.A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 2002;346(23):1773-1780
  • 3Sousa JE, Costa MA, Sousa AG,et al. Two-year angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents in human coronary arteries. Circulation 2003;107(3):381-383
  • 4Holmes DR Jr, Leon MB, Moses JW, et al.Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis. Circulation 2004;109(5):634-640
  • 5Kelbaek H, Helqvist S, Thuesen L, et al.Sirolimus versus bare metal stent implantation in patients with total coronary occlusions: subgroup analysis of the Stenting Coronary Arteries in Non-Stress/Benestent Disease (SCANDSTENT) trial. Am Heart J 2006;152(5):882-886
  • 6Marx SO, Jayaraman T, Go LO, et al.Rapamycin-FKBP inhibits cell cycle regulators of proliferation in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res 1995;76(3):412-417
  • 7Gregory CR, Pratt RE, Huie P, et al.Effects of treatment with cyclosporine, FK 506, rapamycin, mycophenolic acid, or deoxyspergualin on vascular muscle proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Transplant Proc 1993;25(1 Pt 1):770-771
  • 8Gregory CR, Huie P, Shorthouse R, et al.Treatment with rapamycin blocks arterial intimal thickening following mechanical and alloimmune injury. Transplant Proc 1993;25(1 Pt 1):120-121
  • 9杨锋,李绍龙,李易.国产长药物支架治疗冠脉长病变的疗效评估[J].中国心血管病研究,2007,5(4):282-283. 被引量:10
  • 10Singh M, Gersh BJ, McClelland RL,et al. Clinical and angiographic predictors of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Prevention of Restenosis With Tranilast and Its Outcomes (PRESTO) trial. Circulation 2004;109(22):2727-2731

二级参考文献19

  • 1陈纪林,高润霖,杨跃进,乔树宾,秦学文,姚民,刘海波,吴永健,袁晋青,陈珏,徐波.雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架在冠心病复杂病变中应用的近远期疗效[J].中华心血管病杂志,2004,32(10):867-869. 被引量:28
  • 2[1]Kobayashi Y,De Gregorio J,Kobayashi N,et al.Stent segment length as an independent predictor of restnosis.J Am Coll Cardiol,1999,34:651-659.
  • 3[2]Sousa JE,Serruys PW,Costa MA,et al.Frontiers in cardiology:Drug eluting stents:PartI.Circulation,2003,107:2274-2279.
  • 4[3]Kastrati A,Schomig A,Elezi S,et al.Predictive factors of restenosis after coronary stent placement.J Am Coll Cardiol,1997,30:1428-1436.
  • 5[4]Regar E,Serruys PW,Bode C,et al.Angiographic findings of the multicenter randomized study with the sirolimus-eluting Bx velocity balloon-expandable stent(RAVEL).Circulation,2002,106:1949-1956.
  • 6[5]Presbitero P,Zavalloni D,Scattufin M,et al.Procedural and longterm results of sirolimus eluting stent in patients at high risk for restenosis.Minerva Cardioangiol,2004,52:189-194.
  • 7[6]De la Torre Hernandez JM,Burgos V,Gonzalez Enriquez S,et al.Sirolimus-eluting stents to treat lesions with a high risk of restenosis six-month clinical follow-up in the first 100 patients.Rev Esp Cardiol,2004,57:116-122.
  • 8Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization.N Engl J Med,2002,346:1773-1780.
  • 9Kobayashi Y, De Gregorio J, Kobayashi N,et al. Stented segment length as an independent predictor of restenosis.J Am Coll Cardiol,1999,34:651-659.
  • 10Serruys PW,Foley DP,Suttorp M J,et al.A randomized comparison of the value of additional stenting after optimal balloon angioplasty for long coronary lesions:final results of the additional value of NIR stents for treatment of long coronary lesions (ADVANCE) study.J Am Coll Cardio1,2002,39:393-399.

共引文献55

同被引文献78

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部