期刊文献+

有无组织的WTA与射击效率分析 被引量:1

Analysis on Organizational and Un-organizational WTA Strategy and Firing Efficiency
下载PDF
导出
摘要 武器目标分配WTA(Weapon-Target Assignment)问题一直是军事运筹学和管理科学研究的难题之一。以水面舰艇编队对空防御问题为背景,通过解析和仿真的方法研究静态和动态条件下有组织与无组织的武器目标分配问题,并对射击效率进行比较。结果表明:在静态WTA中,无论按"期望值"还是"概率值"作为射击效率的评判标准,有组织目标分配比无组织目标分配要好,而在动态目标分配中,考虑双方的策略,无组织目标分配并不次于有组织目标分配。 Weapon-Target Assignment (WTA) is one of subjects in the military operational research and management science. In this paper, WTA problems between organization and un-organization are discussed by analysis and simulation under the ship formation combat against air targets and firing efficiencies are compared, The results show that organizational firing efficiency is better than unorganizational one in the static WTA. Whether the expected values or probable values are taken as criterion, the organizational target allocation is better than un-organizational one under the static WTA and the un-organizational one is not worse than the organizational one under the dynamic WTA.
出处 《火力与指挥控制》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期28-32,共5页 Fire Control & Command Control
基金 国家社科基金(03GJ091-047) 海军协作课题
关键词 武器目标分配 组织 射击效能 WTA, organization, firing efficiency
分类号 E917 [军事]
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1沙基昌,毛赤龙,吴永波,陈超.战争设计工程技术研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(6):66-70. 被引量:22
  • 2Myron H G M. Enhancing Dynamic Command and Control of Air Operations Against Time Critical Targets[R]. RAND Corp, 2002.
  • 3汪民乐,高晓光,汪德武.两种射击方式下航空武器作战效能计算及其比较分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2003,23(5):131-135. 被引量:2
  • 4Clarke A B, Disney R L. Probability and Random Process [M]. John Wiley Sons, 1985.
  • 5沙基昌 卜先锦.导弹齐射作战效能研究.兵工学报,2006,7(4):445-448.
  • 6Lloyd S P. H S W Weapon's Allocation is NPComplete [A].Proceedings of the IEEE Summer Simulation Conference [C]. Reno, and Nevada. 1986.
  • 7朱齐丹,胡绍勇,宋福香,黄蕾.解武器—目标分配问题的神经网络方法[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,1997,18(3):36-41. 被引量:28
  • 8Cullenbine A, Tabu C A. Search Approach to the Weapon Assignment Model [R]. Department of Operational Sciences, Air Force Institute of Technology, 2000.
  • 9Huang P P K. An Autonomous Optimal Weapon Assignment Algorithm for Ship Self Defense [A]. IEEE[C],1994.
  • 10Patrick A, Hosein M A. Preferential Defense Strategies [R]. LIDS-P-2002,1990 : 1-25.

二级参考文献9

共引文献48

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部