期刊文献+

基于佣金约束的排污权拍卖机制 被引量:5

Research Emissions Permits Auction Model in the Conditions Commission
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于传统的排污权拍卖机制只考虑买卖双方在最大利益原则驱动下厂商的最优出价策略、卖方的期望收益行为等特点,分析了佣金条件下排污权的私人价值和关联价值拍卖机制问题。结果表明,佣金对厂商的出价策略、环保部门和拍卖公司的期望收益都存在影响,佣金的比例与拍卖公司的期望收益同方向变动,与环保部门的期望收益反方向变动,而与厂商的期望收益无关。 In the symmetry independent private value and affiliated value model which induced commission, this paper considers the bidding strategy in the emissions permits first-price and second-price auc tions. We find that the commission rate has effects on the bidders' bidding strategy, on the expected prof its of the seller and the auctioneer. The bigger the commission rate is, the more passively the bidder bids, and the fewer expected profit the seller makes, but the more expected profit the auctioneer has.
出处 《系统管理学报》 北大核心 2008年第2期173-176,共4页 Journal of Systems & Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70573073) 上海哲学社会科学规划项目(2005BJB016)
关键词 排污权拍卖 佣金 期望收益 emissions permit auction commission expected revenue
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[1]Boemare C,Quirion P.Implementing greenhouse gas trading in Europe.Lessons from economic literature and international experiences[J].Ecological Economics,2002,43:213-230.
  • 2[2]Goulder L,Williams P I.The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting[J].Journal of Public Economics,1999,72 (3):329-360.
  • 3[3]Cramton P,Ken S.Tradable carbon permits auctions,how and why to auction not grandfather[J].Energy Policy,2002,30:333-345.
  • 4[4]Fullerton D,Metcalf G.Environmental controls,scarcity rents,and pre-existing distortions[J],journal of Public Economics,2001,80:249-267.
  • 5[5]Milliman S R,Prince R.Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1989,17:247-265.
  • 6[6]Fischer C,Pary I W H,Pizer W A.Instrument choice for environmental protection when technological innovation is endogenous[J],Resources for the Future Discussion Paper,1999,99-104.
  • 7[7]Franciosi R,Isaac R M,Pingry D,et al.An experimental investigation of the Hall-Nell revenue neutral auction for emissions trading[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1993,24:1-24.
  • 8[8]Hahn R,Noll R.Barriers to implementing tradable air pollution permits:problems of regulatory interactions[J].Yale Journal on Regulation,1983 (1):63-91.
  • 9[9]Ledyard J O,Szakaly-Moore K.Designing organizations for trading pollution rights[J].Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1994,25:167-196.
  • 10王彦,毕志伟,李楚霖.佣金收取对拍卖结果的影响[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(4):45-48. 被引量:28

二级参考文献16

  • 1Milgrom P R, Weber R J. A theory of auctions and competitive bidding[J]. Econometrica, 1982, 50: 1089-1122.
  • 2Piccione M, Tan Guo-Fu. A simple model of expert and non-expert bidding in first-price auctions[J]. Journal of Economic Theory,1996, 70: 501-515.
  • 3Maskin Eric, Riley Hohn. Asymmetric auctions[J]. Review of Economics Studies, 2000, 67: 413-438.
  • 4Graham D A, Mashall R C. Collusive bidder behavior at a single object second-price and English auctions[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1987, 95(6): 1217-1239.
  • 5McAfee P, McMillan J. Bidding rings[J]. American Economic Review, 1992, 82: 579-599.
  • 6Martin P. A study of collusion in first-price auctions[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2000, 67: 483-497.
  • 7Hendricks K, Porter R H, Tan Guo-Fu. Optimal selling strategies for oil and gas leases with an informed buyer[J]. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 1993, 83: 234-239.
  • 8Bikkchandani, Sushil, Huang Chi-Fu. The economics of treasury securities markets[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1993,(7): 117-134.
  • 9Porter R H K, Wilson C A. Auctions for oil and gas leases with an informed bidder and a random reservation price[J]. Econometrica, 1994, 62: 1415-1444.
  • 10Dorter Robert. The role of information in U.S offshore oil and gas lease auctions[J]. Econometrica, 1995, 63: 1-27.

共引文献27

同被引文献50

  • 1陈德湖,李寿德,蒋馥.排污权拍卖方式比较研究[J].上海管理科学,2005,27(2):40-42. 被引量:7
  • 2陈德湖.基于一级密封拍卖的排污权交易博弈模型[J].工业工程,2006,9(3):49-51. 被引量:16
  • 3邝山.排污权拍卖的最优机制设计[J].上海管理科学,2006,28(3):76-77. 被引量:4
  • 4奚君羊,马永波.三种国债拍卖方式的拍卖收入比较研究[J].财经研究,2006,32(12):65-74. 被引量:3
  • 5于远光,孟凡强.不完全竞争市场下排污权拍卖的价格操纵分析[J].决策参考,2009,(11):41-43.
  • 6Galiana, F. D, Khatib, S. E. Emission allowances auction for an oligopolistic electricity market operat- ing under cap -- and -- trade r J]. IET Generation Transmission& Distribution, 2010, (2) : 191-199.
  • 7Fu Shi--jun, Ren Yu--long. A motivating mitiga- tion mechanism for generators on condition of coor- dinated regulation of emission and electricity market [J]. International Journal of Electrical Power& En- ergy, 2011,(5):1 151-1 160.
  • 8Vijay Krishna.Auction Theory[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.9:1-4,127-134.
  • 9王金南,杨金田,严刚.电力行业排污交易涉设计[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2011.
  • 10PORTER R,ZONA D. Detection of bid rigging in procurement auctions[ J]. J Politial Eco,1993,101 (3) :518-538.

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部