期刊文献+

^18F-FDG PET/CT在纵隔淋巴结鉴别诊断中的价值 被引量:2

Differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node by PET/CT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨18F-FDG PET/CT对纵隔淋巴结的鉴别诊断价值。方法对18F-FDG异常摄取的纵隔淋巴结最终确诊为良性病变者9例(50枚)和恶性病变者13例(35枚)的淋巴结进行比较分析。结果良性组和恶性组淋巴结的大小、CT值、SUV值分别为1.30cm、85.54HU、5.70和2.03cm、37.03HU、7.46,两组之间有统计学差异(P<0.01)。延迟显像前、后良性组和恶性组淋巴结SUV值分别为4.81、4.71和7.61、7.92,均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。良性组4L(22%)、11(20%)、4R(16%)和10R(14%)为好发部位;恶性组2R(17%)、4R(17%)、4L(14%)、7(11%)和10L(11%)部位多见。良、恶性组淋巴结在PET/CT图像上有不同的表现特征。结论淋巴结大小、CT值、SUV值在良?恶性鉴别诊断中有一定参考作用;延迟显像帮助不大;掌握PET/CT影像学特征,结合病史和其他实验室检查等综合分析对纵隔18F-FDG阳性淋巴结的鉴别诊断起重要作用。 Objective To explore the differential diagnosis value of PET/CT in mediastinal lymph node. Methods Patients with positive mediastinal lymph node detected by ^18 F-FDG PET/CT were trailed and observed, and then a contrast analysis was made between 9 benign cases with 50 lymph nodes and 13 cases of mediastinal lymph node metastasis with 35 lymph nodes. Radiotraeer: ^18F-FDG. Imaging instrument: Discovery LS PET/CT. Results The size, CT rumber and SUV of ^18F-FDG positive lymph nodes in the benign and malignant groups were 1.30 cm, 85.54 HU, 5.70 and 2.03 cm, 37.03 HU, 7.46, respectively. The values between these two groups were statistically different (P〈0.01). The SUV values of benign and malignant groups before and after delayed imaging were 4.81, 4.71 and 7.61, 7.92, which showed no statistical significance (P〉0.05). According to American Thoracic Society classification, the benign lesions were likely to be in the following body parts: 22% of them in 4L, 20% in 11, 16% in 4R and 14% in 10R, and the malignant lesions usually occurred: 17% of them in 2R, 17% in 4R, 14% in 4L, 11% in 7 and 11% in 10I. Benign and malignant lymph nodes showed different features on PET/CT images. Conclusion The size, CT rumber and SUV of the lymph nodes can be used as refer ences in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions; delayed imaging shows no reference value;recognition of the features of PET/CT images plays an important role in differential diagnosis of mediastina118 F-FDG positive lymph nodes while the combination with case history and other laboratory examinations should be emphasized.
作者 党亚萍 王琦
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期781-784,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 体层摄影术 发射型计算机 体层摄影术 X线计算机 纵隔淋巴结 诊断 Tomography, emission computed, Tomography, X-ray eomputed Mediastinal lymph node Diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1李松年.现代全身CT诊断学[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2001.1018.
  • 2Steinert HC, Hauser M, Allenman F, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: nodal staging with FDG PET versus CT with correlative lymph node mapping and sampling. Radiology, 1997,202(2):441- 446.
  • 3Vasteenkiste JF, Stroobants SG, De Leyn PR, et al. Lymph node staging in NSCLC with FDG-PET: a prospective study on 690 lymph node stations from 68 patients. J Clin Oncol, 1998, 16(6), 2142-2149.
  • 4陆舜,管一晖,阮晓明,陶巨蔚,艾星浩,赵军.非小细胞肺癌纵膈淋巴结影像学分期的研究[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2005,10(1):49-51. 被引量:4
  • 5Graeter TP, Hellwig D, Hoffmann K, et al. Mediastinal lymph node staging in suspected lung cancer: comparison of positron emission tomography with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose and mediastinoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg, 2003,75(1):231-236.
  • 6杨光,姚树展,黄葵红,宁国庆,刘庆伟,李昕,刘松涛.^(18)F-PET-CT显像在肺癌纵隔淋巴结转移中临床应用价值[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2007,45(8):846-848. 被引量:5
  • 7张成琪,王广丽,宋吉清,姚树展,刘庆伟,陈静.^(18)F-FDG PET-CT评价非小细胞肺癌淋巴结分期的价值[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2007,45(10):1038-1041. 被引量:5

二级参考文献21

  • 1赵春雷,高硕,陈秋松,李亚军,李大成,邢喜玲,王俊起.^(18)F-FDG PET/CT显像在非小细胞肺癌术前分期中的价值[J].中华核医学杂志,2005,25(2):78-81. 被引量:15
  • 2李万龙,于金明,范廷勇,付政,刘希斌,仲伟霞,张利民.氟脱氧葡萄糖PET-CT对非小细胞肺癌纵隔淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2005,14(3):166-169. 被引量:20
  • 3Toloza EM, Harpole L, MeCrory DC. Noninvasive Staging of Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer [ J ]. Chest, 2003,123 : 137S - 146S.
  • 4Pietennan RM, Van Putten JW, Meuzelaar JJ. et al. Preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with positron emission tomography [ J ]. N Engl J Med,2000, 343 : 254 - 261.
  • 5Vansteenkiste JF, Stroobants SG, De Leyn PR, et al. Lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer with FDG-PET scan: a prospective study on 690 lymph node stations from 68 patients [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 1998,16:2142 - 2149.
  • 6Vansteenkiste JF, Stroobants SG, Dupont PJ, et al. FDG-PET scan in potentially operable non-small-cell lung cancer: do an metabolic PET-CT fusion images improve the localization of regional lymph node metastases? The Leuven Lung Cancer Group[ J]. Eur J Nucl Med, 1998,25 : 1495 - 2534.
  • 7Magnani P, Carretta A, Rizzo G,et al. FDG/PET, and spiral CT image fusion for mediastinal lymph node assessment of non-small cell lung cancer patients [ J ]. J Cardiovasc Surg ( torino). 1999,40:741 - 748.
  • 8Dietlein M, Weber K, Gandjour A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for the management of potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: priority for a PET-based strategy after nodal-negative CT results[ J]. Eur J Med, 2000,27:1598 - 1609.
  • 9Jolly PC, Hutchinson CH, Detterbeck F, et al. Routine computed tomographic scans, selective mediastinoscope, and other factors in evaluation of lung cancer[ J ]. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1991 , 102 :226 - 270.
  • 10Haag DW,Follectte DW,Roberts PF,et al.Advantages of Positron emission tomography over computed tomography staging of non-small cell lung cancer[J].J Surg Res,2002,103(2):160-164.

共引文献175

同被引文献43

  • 1刘欣悦,黄廉卿.利用多分辨率直方图特征分类数字X光乳腺图像[J].光学精密工程,2006,14(2):327-332. 被引量:10
  • 2郑列,吴沛宏,莫运仙,谢传淼,阮超美,李立,沈静娴,戎铁华,王欣,张仕义.非小细胞肺癌纵隔淋巴结分期:螺旋CT和病理检查对照[J].癌症,2006,25(11):1384-1388. 被引量:6
  • 3Takamochi K, Nagai K, and Suzuki K, et al.. Clinical predictors of N2 disease in non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Chest, 2000, 117: 1577-1582.
  • 4Kunio D. Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: Historical review, current status and future potential [J]. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 2007, 31: 198-211.
  • 5Liu L, Liu W Y, and Sun X M. Automated detection of pulmonary nodules in CT images with support vector machines [C]. Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Instrumentation Science and Technology, Shenyang, China, Sep. 15-18, 2008, Vol.1: 550-555.
  • 6Campadelli P, Casiraghi E, and Valentini G. Support vector machines for candidate nodules classification[J]. Neuro Computing, 2005, Vol.68: 281-288.
  • 7Leef J L and Klein J S. The solitary pulmonary nodule[J]. Radiol Clin North Am, 2002, 40(1): 123-143.
  • 8Sortini D, Maravegias K, and Sortini A. Difficulty of early diagnosis in patients with solitary pulmonary nodule [J]. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2005, 129(5): 1196.
  • 9Chapelle O, Haffner P, and Vapnik V. SVMs for histogram-based image classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1999, 10(5): 1055-1065.
  • 10Belikova T P, Yashunskaya N I, and Kogan E A. Computeraided differential diagnosis of small solitary pulmonary nodules[J]. Computers and Biomedical Research, 1996, 29(1): 48-62.

引证文献2

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部