期刊文献+

灾难事件后继风险决策 被引量:6

How has the Low-probability/higy-consequence Event Influenced Risky Decision Making?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对小概率/高风险的灾难事件的后继风险决策进行探讨,着重在决策的认知神经经济模型框架下,讨论灾难事件后继风险决策的影响因素。灾难事件后人们的风险觉知、信念和假定、经验等认知因素以及灾后情绪因素对于决策分别有不同的影响;人们灾后决策的特点为决策更多直觉化而较少运用理性分析;灾难后继决策有随时间变化的趋势,灾难事件后人们为寻求安全感而出现"损失偏差"(loss bias),该偏差在"获得"和"损失"两种条件下的影响是不同的。灾后风险决策的内在机制或可用思维和决策的双加工系统(dual-process)模型来解释。最后展望了灾难事件后继决策进一步的研究方向。 How the risky decision is made after a low-probability disaster with high-consequences was discussed, which aimed to find out the factors influencing post-disaster decision making within the framework of Cognitive Neuroeconomic Model. Study shows that the emotional factors and cognitive factors including beliefs, assumptions, risk perceptions and past experience have difference influence on the decision making of post-disaster, which is more based on intuition and less on theoretical analysis. Meanwhile, the decision making of post-disaster varies with the time. To seek sense of security after disaster, loss bias will occur to people, which has different influence under the conditions of "gain" and "loss". The intrinsic mechanism of risky decision making after disaster can be explained by the dual-process model. Finally, the research trend of decision making after disaster was prospected.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 2008年第4期37-43,共7页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(70671099) 中国科学院“百人计划”项目 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KSCX2-YW-R-130)
关键词 灾难 决策 情绪 认知 时间 disaster decision making emotions cognition time
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Bonn I. , Sharyn R.T. Do or die-strategic decision-making following a shock event [J]. Tourism Management,2007,28: 615 - 620
  • 2Adams R. E. , Boscarino J. A. stress and well-being in the aftermath of the word trade center attack: the continuning effects of a communitywide disaster [J]. Journal of Community Psychology,2005,33(2) :175 - 190
  • 3Gigerenzer G. Dread risk, September 11, and fatal traffic accidents [J]. American Psychological Society, 2004,15(4) : 286 - 287
  • 4Sacco K. , Galletto V. , Blanzieri E. How has the 9/11 terrorist attack influenced decision making [J]. Applied Cognitive Psychology ,2003,17 : 1113 - 1127
  • 5李纾.发展中的行为决策研究[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(4):490-496. 被引量:39
  • 6Over D. Rationality and the Normative/Descriptive Distinction [M].//Koehler D. J. ,Harvey H. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ,2004:3 -18
  • 7Li S. Equate-to-differentiate approach: An application in binary choice under uncertainty [J]. Central European Journal of Operations Research ,2004,12 (3) : 269 - 294
  • 8Bechara A. Neurobiology of decision-making: risk and reward [J]. Semin Clin Neuropsychiatr,2001,6(3) :205 - 216
  • 9Gutnik L. A., Hakimzada A. F. , Yoskowitz N.A. ,et al. The role of emotion in decision-making: A cognitive neuroeconomic approach towards understanding sexual risk behavior [J]. Journal of Biomedical Informatics,2006,39:720 -736
  • 10谢晓非,徐联仓.风险认知研究概况及理论框架[J].心理科学进展,1995,5(2):17-22. 被引量:176

二级参考文献80

共引文献293

同被引文献97

引证文献6

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部