期刊文献+

赛尼哌预防肾移植急性排斥反应的临床观察 被引量:2

Clinical observation of effect of Zenapax on prevention of acute rejection after kidney transplantation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨赛尼哌(Zenapax)在预防肾脏移植急性排斥反应的临床效果及其安全性。方法选择2002年~2005年5月接受尸体肾移植88例,术前HLA氨基酸残基配型均为2MM错配,淋巴毒交叉配型阴性。其中群体反应抗体阳性受者为A组(n=28),其余随机分为赛尼哌治疗组B组(n=30)和对照组C组(n=30),A和B组赛尼哌用单剂50mg诱导治疗,手术前2h静脉给药。所有受者在围手术期和术后均采用同样"三联"免疫抑制方案。结果3组之间的年龄、性别、ABO血型分布、供肾冷热缺血时间差异无显著性。急性排斥反应诊断标准依据临床表现,生化检验,超声波检查,肾移植术后3个月内,A组急性排斥发生率为14.3%(n=4),B组急性排斥发生率为6.7%(n=2),C组急性排斥发生率为16.7%(n=5)。使用赛尼哌B组急性排斥发生率明显低于不用赛尼哌组(P<0.05),并且赛尼哌组需要接受抗淋巴细胞球蛋白(ALG)治疗的患者少于不用赛尼哌组,胃肠道反应、血液系统的损害及感染发生率等方面差异无显著性。结论通过临床观察赛尼哌可减少急性排斥反应的发生率而不增加总体免疫抑制剂的副作用和感染的并发症,对于PRA阳性受者只要避免致敏的抗体,其治疗效果仍然是良好的。 [Objective] To observe the effect and security of Zenapax on prevention of acute rejection after kidney transplantation. [Methods] 88 cases of cadaveric renal transplantation from 2002 to May 2005 were chosen. In them, HLA zygosity showed 2MM mismatch, cross-zygosity showed negative. All of the cases were divided into group A (PRA positive, n=28), group B (negative, n =30) and control group(n =30). Groups A and B were administered derivation treatment of 50 mg Zenapax 2 hours before operation. All the cases received the same immunotherapy in preoperative and postoperative periods. [Results] Acute rejection rate was 14.3% in group A(n =4), 6.7% in group B (n=2) and 16.7% in group C (n =5). Acute rejection rate was significantly lower in group B than that in the control group(P 〈0.05). There was insignificant difference in infection and side effects between both groups. [Conclusion] It is effective and secure to use single dosage Zenapax for the prevention of acute rejection after renal tranplantation.
机构地区 昆明肾脏病医院
出处 《中国现代医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第10期1432-1433,共2页 China Journal of Modern Medicine
关键词 赛尼哌 肾移植 急性排斥 Zenapax kidney transplantation acute rejection
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献11

  • 1Sanfilippo F, Vaughn WK. Coomparative effects of pregnancy, trasfusion and prior rejection on sensitization and 1 transplant results. Transplantation. 1982, 34:360.
  • 2Ting A, Morris PJ. Reactivity of autolymphocytotoxic antibodies from chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Transplantation. 1978, 25:31.
  • 3Pate, Terasaki PI, siginificance of the positive crossmatch test in kidney transplantation. N Engl Med. 1969,280.
  • 4Kerman RH, Orosz CG, Lorber MI. Clinical relevance of anti - HLA antibodies pre and post translant. Am J Med Sic. 1997, 313:275.
  • 5Terasaki PI, Mcclelland JD. Microdroplet assay of human cytotoxins.Nature. 1964, 204:998.
  • 6Terasaki PI cho Y, Takemoto s, et al. Twenty - year follow up on the effect of HLA matching on kidney transplant survival and prediction of future twenty-year survival. Transplant proc. 1996, 28:1144.
  • 7Daniel As, Kathryn JW, Indirect presentation of MHC antigens in transplantation. Immunology Today. 1994,15 (1) :32.
  • 8李留洋,高伟,王希文.肾移植受者致敏状态的预测及其临床意义[J].中华器官移植杂志,1997,18(4):234-236. 被引量:14
  • 9谭建明,唐孝达,周永昌.器官移植HLA-IgG抗体测定方法的比较研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2000,21(4):208-210. 被引量:9
  • 10于立新,萧露露,付绍杰,白喜文,徐健,马俊杰,叶桂荣,邓文锋,王亦斌,杜传福,刘小友.PRA、HLA配型技术在肾移植中的应用[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2000,21(5):277-279. 被引量:16

共引文献11

同被引文献30

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部