博弈之中定规则——《政府信息公开条例》与《政府信息公开条例专家建议稿》之比较研究

Make Rules In Playing the Games——Comparative Studies On the Regulations On Government Information Openess Of PRC And Its Experts' Proposal Version

《中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例》与其《专家建议稿》相比,存在诸多差异。在知情权方面,《建议稿》将知情权作为立法基础,而《条例》未规定此项权利,两相比较,后者更符合法律规定。在公开原则方面,《条例》未采用《建议稿》所遵循的国际惯例,而采用列举式与排除式相结合的立法例。在信息发布机制方面,《条例》所规定的协调机制和保密审查机制前所未有,极具中国特色。在救济制度方面,《条例》摒弃《建议稿》行政复议前置的模式,采用行政诉讼与行政复议并列的救济模式。

Compared with its experts＇ proposal version, the Regulations on Government Information Openess of PRC differs in many aspects. In aspect of Right to Know, the proposal version considers it a foundation of legislation. On the contrary, the Regulations does not stipulate such right. Through a comparison, the latter is in conformity with the law better. In aspect of Principles of Openess, the Regulations does not apply the international common convention followed by the proposal version and instead it applies a legislation form of combining citation and elimination. In aspect of Mechanism of Information Distribution, the Regulations stipulates pioneer mechanisms of coordination and confidential inspection, which is of Chinese characteristic. In aspect of System of Relief, the Regulations abandons the mode of putting the administrative reconsideration on the first place applied by the proposal version, and instead it applies a relief mode of administrative litigation and administrative reconsideration in the meantime.