期刊文献+

解决策略冲突导致BGP路由发散的自适应机制 被引量:5

An Adaptive Mechanism to Solve BGP Divergence Resulted from Policies Conflict
下载PDF
导出
摘要 BGP(border gateway protocol)作为一种基于策略的协议,允许每个自治系统独立地选择本地路由策略.自治系统之间可能存在的路由策略冲突会引起BGP路由持续不稳定.当前提出的解决办法要么需要增加额外的通信开销,要么限制自治系统自由的选择路由策略.提出了一种解决策略冲突引起BGP路由不收敛的自适应方法,既不损害自治系统选择路由策略的灵活性,也不需要在BGP消息中增加额外信息.路由的稳定性被加入到BGP的判决过程中,不稳定路由的优先级被降低,使更加稳定的路由得以被选为最优路由,终止路由策略冲突引起的争执.在网络拓扑发生改变的情况下,这种新方法能够自适应地调整路由选择,重新收敛到新的稳定状态. As a policy-based routing protocol, BGP (border gateway protocol) allows each AS to choose local routing policy independently. Possible policies conflict may result in BGP route persistent oscillation. This paper proposes an adaptive mechanism to guarantee BGP convergence with policies conflict, which neither impairs the flexibility of choosing routing policy, nor inserts additional information in BGP messages. With the mechanism, route stability is taken into BGP decision process so that unstable route is degraded to cause more stable route to be chosen to stop policies dispute. The new mechanism also can adapt to topology change and converge to new stable route.
出处 《软件学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期1465-1472,共8页 Journal of Software
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.60473082(国家自然科学基金) the National Basic Research Program of China under Grant No.2003CB314801(国家重点基础研究发展计划(973))
关键词 边界网关协议 域间路由 路由策略冲突 路由收敛 border gateway protocol (BGP) inter-domain routing policies conflict routing convergence
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Rekhter Y, Li T, Hares S. A border gateway protocol 4 (BGP-4). RFC 4271, 2006.
  • 2Villamizar C, Chandra R, Govindan R. BGP route flap damping. RFC 2439, 1998.
  • 3Varadhan K, Govindan R, Estrin D. Persistent route oscillations in inter-domain routing. Computer Networks, 2000,(32): 1-16.
  • 4Griffin TG, Shepherd FB, Wilfong G. The stable paths problem and interdomain routing. IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, 2002, 10(2):3104-3107.
  • 5Griffin T, Wilfong G. A safe path vector protocol. In: Proc. of the IEEE INFOCOM, Vol.2. Tel Aviv: IEEE, 2000. 490-499.
  • 6Cobb JA, Musunuri R. Enforcing convergence in inter-domain routing. In: Proc. of the GLOBECOM, Vol.3. Dallas: IEEE, 2004. 1353-1358.
  • 7Alaettinoglu C, Villamizar C, Gerich E, Kessens D, Meyer D, Bates T, Karrenberg D, Terpstra M. Routing policy specification language (RPSL). IETF RFC 2622, 1999.
  • 8Meyer D, Schmitz J, Orange C, Prior M, Alaettinoglu C. Using RPSL in practice. IETF RFC 2650, 1999.
  • 9Griffin T, Wilfong G. An analysis of BGP convergence properties. In: Proc. of the ACM SIGCOMM, Vol. 29. New York: ACM, 1999.277-288.
  • 10Gao L, Rexford J. Stable Internet routing without global coordination. IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, 2001,9(6):681-692.

同被引文献45

  • 1王洪君,王瑞军,王大东,高远.基于过滤机制的抑制BGP路由表增长的方法[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2004,25(8):754-757. 被引量:1
  • 2吉萌,余少华,詹翊春.双冗余结构路由器故障恢复模型与方案研究[J].通信学报,2006,27(6):21-28. 被引量:4
  • 3张晓哲,卢锡城,苏金树.分布式BGP协议体系结构[J].国防科技大学学报,2006,28(3):77-82. 被引量:5
  • 4黄力.基于分布式群身份认证的传感器网络设计与实现[J].计算机工程,2007,33(10):161-163. 被引量:24
  • 5Huston G. Analyzing the Internet's BGP routing table[J].The Internet Protocol Journal, 2001,4( 1):1-10.
  • 6Xu Z, Meng X, Zhang L, et al. Impact of IPv4 address allocation practice on BGP routing table growth[A]//IEEE 18th Annual Workshop on Computer Communications[C]. New York, USA: IEEE press, 2003:172--178.
  • 7Rekhter Y, Li T. An architecture for IP address allocation with CIDR[S], RFC 1518,1993.
  • 8Fuller V, Li T, Yu J, etal. Classless Inter--Domain Routing(CIDR) .. An address assignment and aggregation strategy[S]. RFC 1519,1993.
  • 9Belloin S , Bush R , Griffin T G, et at. Slowing routing table growth by filtering based on address allocation policies [ EB/OL ] . [2001-06-20]http://www. research, art. com.
  • 10H Liu Reducing routing table size using ternary--CAM[J]// Proceedings of the 9th Symposium on High Performance Interconnects [C] Stanford, Calif, USA, 2001:69-7:3.

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部