美国大学教师学术自由权利保障的制度分析被引量：1

下载PDF

导出

摘要学术自由权利是保障大学教师从事知识创新与探索活动的基本权利,美国的终身教职制、教师工会与集体谈判、黑名单制度较好地协调和解决了美国大学教师学术自由权利保障问题,促进了美国高等教育的发展和繁荣。对其制度进行分析,以期促进中国大学教师学术自由权利保障。

作者陈芳

机构地区肇庆科技职业技术学院外语系

出处《现代教育科学（高教研究）》 2008年第3期52-55,共4页

关键词美国大学教师学术自由权利保障终身教职集体谈判黑名单制度

分类号 G649.712 [文化科学—高等教育学] D925.2 [政治法律—诉讼法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献14

1[1]AAUP.Report --Financial Exigency,Academic Governance,and Related Matters[EB/OL].http:// www.aaup.org/statements/REPORTS/Financial,htm,2005-11-09.
2[2]AAUP.The 1940 Statement of Principles on Aca-demic Freedom and Tenure[EB/OL].http://www.aaup.org/ statements/Redbook/ 1940stat.htm,2005-12-12.
3李子江.美国大学集体谈判制度的形成与发展[J].比较教育研究,2006,27(3):23-27. 被引量：12
4[5]Philo A Hutcheson.A Professional Professoriate U-nionization,Bureaucratization and AAUP[M].Nashville:Vanderbilt University Press,2000.67.
5[6]Rhoades G.Managed Professionals:Unionized Fac-ulty and Restructuring Academic Labor[M].New York:State University of New York Press,1998.27-28.
6陈伟.论西方学术专业的工会化变革[J].比较教育研究,2005,26(2):18-23. 被引量：5
7[8]AAUP.What Is Censure?[EB/OL].http:// www.aaup.org/Com-a/ prcenback,htm,2005-12-12.
8[9]AAUP.Censured Administrations 1930-2002[EB/OL].http://www.aaup.org/Com-a/allcen,htm,2005-12-12.
9[10]arry Gordon.Tenure on Trial[EB/OL].http://www.stanford,edu/ dept/ news/ stanfordtoday/ed/ 9809/9809fea201.shtml.2005-12-12.
10[11][美]亨利·罗索夫斯基.美国校园文化一学生·教授·管理[M].谢宗仙等译.济南:山东人民出版社,1996:158.

二级参考文献49

1Clark B. C,ed. (1984). The Academic Profession: National,Disciplinary, and Institutional Settings, Berkley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, p. 171 - 172.
2Haug M. R. and Sussman M. B. (1971) . Professionalization and Unionism, In Professions in Contemporary Society, Special Issue of American Behavioral Scientist, 14:525 - 540.
3Larson M. S. (1977) . The Rise of Professionalism: a Sociological Analysis, Berkeley. Los Angeles. London:Universiyt of California Press, p. 157.
4Clark B. R. (1987). The Academic Life: Small Worlds,Different Worlds, The Carnegie Foundation For The Advancement of Teaching, p. 183.
5Shumar. W. (1997). College for Sale: A Critique of the Commodification of Higher Education, London、 Washington, D.C.: The Falmer Press, pp. 83 -84, p. 90,p. 103, p. 116, p. 163.
6SlaughterS. and Leilie L. L. (1997) . Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and Entrepreneurial University.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, p. 5.
7Shumar W. (1997) . College for Sale: A Critique of the Commodification of Higher Education, London、 Washington, D. C.: The Falmer Press, p. 175.
8Hansen W.L. and Guidugli T. F. (1990) . Comparating Salary and Employment Gains for Higher Education Administrators and Faculty Members, Journal of Higher Education[J], 61, (2): 142 - 159.
9Clark B. R ed. (1984). The Academic Profession: National, Disciplinary, and Institutional Settings, Berkley,Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, p. 46.
10Kerr C. (1991) . The Great Transformation in Higher Education: 1960- 1980, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 48 - 53.