基于技术风险的并行研发联盟成员投资策略研究被引量：10

Research on Members' Investment Polices in Parallel R&D Alliances with Technological Uncertainty

下载PDF

导出

摘要研究了存在技术风险时,平均分配和按投入比例分配方式下并行研发联盟成员的投资策略,并分析了技术风险和利益分配方式对联盟成员投资策略的影响。研究表明,当市场收益较高时,技术风险和市场收益均能提高并行研发联盟成员的期望投入,因此并行合作研发适合于市场收益和技术风险均较大的新品研发;按投入比例分配比平均分配获得的联盟成员期望投入多,所以并行研发联盟应尽可能按投入比例分配收益,促进合作研发的成功。 In this research, the investment polices of parallel R＆D alliance members with technological uncertainty under equal and proportional profit sharing arrangement is studied, and the impact of technological uncertainty and profit sharing arrangement on members＇ investment polices is analyzed. It shows that parallel cooperative R＆D is suit for developing new products with high market returns and technological uncertainty, as both market returns and R＆D risk can promote member＇s expected investment when market is comparatively high; parallel R＆D alliances should share profit proportionally to make a success in cooperative R＆D, as members＇ expected investment under proportional profit - sharing arrangement is higher than that under equal profit - sharing arrangement.

作者孟卫东黄波李宇雨

机构地区重庆大学经济与工商管理学院

出处《软科学》 CSSCI 2008年第6期88-92,共5页 Soft Science

基金重庆市科委软科学项目(CSTC2007CE110)

关键词技术风险利益分配方式并行研发联盟 technological uncertainty profit sharing arrangement parallel R＆D alliances

分类号 F016 [经济管理—政治经济学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1Fredrik /-Iaeklin, Christian Marxt, Fritz Fahrni. Strategic Venture Partner Selection for Collaborative Innovation in Production Systems: A Decision Support System - based Approach [ J ]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2006, 104 ( 1 ) : 100 - 112.
2Dermot Leahy, J Peter Neary. Absorptive Capacity, R&D Spillovers, and Public Policy[ J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2007, 25 (5) : 1089 - 1108.
3Ishii A. Cooperative R&D between Vertically Related Firms With Spillovers [ J ]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2004, 22(8 -9) :1213 - 1235.
4Mody A. Learning Through Alliance[ J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1993, 20(2) :151 - 170.
5Amaldoss W. Collaboration to Compete[ J]. Marketing Science, 2000, 19(2) :105 -126.
6孙红侠,李仕明.并行研发联盟中合作伙伴资源投入决策分析[J].预测,2005,24(2):42-45. 被引量：18
7Kaz Miyagiwa, Yuka Ohno. Uncertainty, Spillovers, and Cooperative R&D [ J ]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2002. 20 (6) : 855 - 876.
8Michael D Santoro, Joseph P McGill. The Effect of Uncertainty and Asset Co - specialization on Governance in Biotechnology Alliances [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26 ( 13 ) : 1261 - 1269.
9Leonardo P Santiago, Pirooz Vakili. On the Value of Flexibility in R&D Projects[J]. Management Science, 2005, 51 (8) :1206 - 1218.
10Karan Girotra, Christian Terwiesch, Karl T. Ulrich. Valuing R&D Projects in a Portfolio: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry [J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(9) : 1452 - 1466.

二级参考文献7

1Bucklin L P, Sengupta S. Organizing successful co-marketing alliance[J]. Marketing, 1993,57:32-46.
2Dutta S, Weiss A M. The relationship between a firm's level of technological innovativeness and its pattern of partnership agreements[J]. Management Science, 1997,43:343-356.
3Harrigan K R. Joint ventures and competitive strategy[J]. Strategic Management, 1988,9:141-158.
4Blecke J, Ernst D. The way to win in cross-border alliances[J]. Harvard Business, Revised, 1991,69:127-135.
5Mody A. Learning through alliance[J]. Ecoront- Behav. Organ, 1993,29:151-170.
6Amaldoss W. Collaboration to compete[J]. Marketing Science, 2000,19(2): 105-126.
7Parise S, Henderson J C. Knowledge exchange in strategic alliances[J]. IBM System, 2001,40(4).