期刊文献+

前列腺癌近距离治疗后下尿路症状变化的观察分析 被引量:3

Change in lower urinary tract symptoms after brachytherapy for prostate cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨前列腺癌近距离治疗后下尿路症状的变化发展规律,为临床治疗提供指导。方法接受近距离治疗的前列腺癌患者122例。年龄48-84岁,平均72岁。临床分期为T1cN0M0~T3N0M0治疗前PSA0.9~65.0ng/ml,Gleason评分5~9分,前列腺体积12~57ml。国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS评分)3~19分,平均12分。植入粒子30~86粒,活度11.1~19.6MBq,总活度444~1591MBq;植入针16~28根。术前2周至术后6个月常规使用α受体阻滞剂,术前1~6个月使用新辅助治疗106例(86.9%)。观察治疗后下尿路症状的变化。结果122例随访3~34个月,平均21个月。急性尿潴留8例(6.6%),保留尿管5~14d后拔除均可自行排尿;轻度尿失禁10例(8.2%),均在术后2~4个月好转。出现尿频、尿急及排尿困难或加重107例(87.7%)。术后0.5、1、2、3、6、9、12、15、18、21、24及30个月出现尿频、尿急及排尿困难或加重者分别为16.4%、80.3%、81.2%、74.6%、42.0%、25.2%、18.5%、11.5%、7.4%、2.5%、3.3%及0。下尿路症状持续时间与治疗前IPSS评分及前列腺体积成正相关,P值分别为0.012及0.003。结论前列腺癌近距离治疗后下尿路症状常见,持续时间较长,但不严重,均可恢复。持续时间与治疗前IPSS评分及前列腺体积相关。使用a受体阻滞剂及新辅助治疗可以有效缓解症状并避免手术干预。 Objective To evaluate the lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after prostate cancer hrachytherapy. Methods 122 patients with prostate carcinoma underwent 12sI seed implanta tion. All patients were at clinical stage T1c N0M0 T3N0M0 with Gleason score 5 to 9, serum PSA 0. 9 65.0ng/ml, prostate volume 12 to 57ml. 30-86 seeds were implanted by 16 28 needles with seed activity 1.11-19.6 MBq mci, total seed activity 444 1591 MBq. International prostate symptom score (IPSS) ranged from 3 to 19, with mean of 12. All the patients received a-blocker and 106 cases(86.9%)received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Results Patients were followed-up for 3-34 months (mean 21 months). Acute urinary retention was found in 8 cases(6.6 %)and mild urina ry incontinence was found in 10 cases (8.2%). During the follow-up, 107(87.7%)of them had LUTS or LUTS symptoms aggravated. Percentage of patients with LUTS after brachytherapy at different time point were as follow: 15 d, 16.4%; 1 month, 80.3% ; 2 months, 81.2% ; 3 months, 74.6% 6 months, 42.0% 9 months, 25.2%; 12 months, 18.5% 15 months, 11.5%;18 months, 7.4% 21 months, 2.5%; 24 months, 3.3% and 30 months, 0%. Larger prostate volume and higher IPSS before hrachytherapy were correlated with LUTS lasting time. Simple linear regression analyses re vealed prostate volume (r=0. 281, P=0. 003) and IPSS (r=0. 254, P=0. 012) before brachytherapy to be significant predictors of LUTS period respectively. Conclusion LUTS after prostate cancer brachytherapy is common and long lasting, but not serious, which could be relieved by a-blockers and ADT.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期419-421,共3页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 近距离治疗 下尿路症状 Prostatic neoplasms Carcinoma Brachytherapy Lower urinary tract symptoms
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Gelblum DY, Potters L, Ashley R, et al. Urinary morbidity following ultrasound guided transperineal prostate seed im plantation. Int J Radiat Oneol Biol Phys, 1999,45:59-67.
  • 2Norderhaug I, Dahl O, Heikkila R, et al. Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review of clinical and cost effectiveness. Eur Urol,2003,44:40-46.
  • 3Merrick GS, Wallner KE, Butler WM. Permanent interstitial brachytherapy for the management of carcinoma of the prostate gland. J Urol, 2003,169:1643-1652.
  • 4Hall JD, Boyd JC, Lippert MC, et al. Why patients choose prostatectomy or brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of a descriptive survey. Urology,2003,61:402- 407.
  • 5Hsu IC, Pickett B, Shinohara K, et al. Normal tissue dosimetric comparison between HDR prostate implant boost and conformal external beam radiotherapy boost: potential for dose escalation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000,46:851- 858.
  • 6李汉忠,严维刚.前列腺癌近距离治疗的研究进展[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(2):129-131. 被引量:11
  • 7Kleinberg L, Wallner K, Roy J, et al. Treatment-related symptoms during the first year following transperineal 125-I prostate implantation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1994, 28:985-990.
  • 8Merrick GS, Bulter WM, Lief JH, et al. Temporal resolution of urinary morbidity following prostate brachytberapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,47:121-128.
  • 9Stone NN, Stock RG. Complications following permanent prostate brachytherapy. Eur Urol, 2002,41 : 427-433.
  • 10Elshaikh MA, Angermeier K, Ulchaker JC, et al. Effect of anatomic, procedural, and dosimetric variables on urinary retention after permanent iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy. Urology,2003,61 : 152-155.

二级参考文献33

  • 1Merrick GS, Bulter WM, Wallner KE, et al. Prophylactic versus therapeutic alpha-blockers after permanent prostate brachytherapy. Urology, 2002, 60: 650-655.
  • 2Celebrezze JP, Medich DS. Rectal ulceration as a result of prostatic brachytherapy: a new clinical problem :report of three cases. Dis Colon Rectum, 2003, 46: 1277-1279.
  • 3Zelefsky MJ, Whitmore WF Jr.Long-term results of retropubic permanent 125iodine implantation of the prostate for clinically localized prostatic cancer. J Urol, 1997, 158: 23-29.
  • 4Holm HH, Juul N, Pedersen JF, et al. Transperineal 125iodine seed implantation in prostatic cancer guided by transrectal ultrasonography. J Urol, 1983, 130: 283-286.
  • 5Nag S. Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Summary of American Brachytherapy Society recommendations. Semin Urol Oncol, 2000, 18: 133-136.
  • 6Nag S, Beyer D, Friedland J, et al. American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Bios Phys, 1999, 44: 789-799.
  • 7Merrick GS, Wallner KE, Butler WM. Permanent interstitial brachytherapy for the management of carcinoma of the prostate gland. J Urol, 2003, 169:1643-1652.
  • 8Merrick GS,Bulter WM. Modified uniform seed loading for prostate brachytherapy: rationale, design and evaluation. Tech Urol, 2000, 6: 78-84.
  • 9Prestidge BR, Bice WS, Kiefer EJ, et al. Timing of computed tomography-based postimplant assessment following permanent transperineal prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1998, 40: 1111-1115.
  • 10Waterman FM, Yue N, Reisinger S, et al. Effect of edema on the post-implant dosimetry of an I-125 prostate implant: a case study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1997, 38: 335-339.

共引文献10

同被引文献14

  • 1严维刚,李汉忠,周毅,纪志刚,王惠君.雄激素全阻断治疗对前列腺体积的影响及相关因素分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(8):556-558. 被引量:12
  • 2Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin, 2010, 60: 277-300.
  • 3Heidenreich A, Aus G, BoUa M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol, 2008, 53: 68-80.
  • 4Kuban DA, Levy LB, Potters L, et al. Comparison of biochemical failure definitions for permanent prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006, 65: 1487-1493.
  • 5Whitmore WF Jr, Hilaris B, Grabstald H. Retropubic implantation of iodine 125 in the treatment of prostate cancer. J Urol, 1972, 108 : 918-920.
  • 6Potters L, Klein EA, Kattan MW, et al. Monotherapy for stage Tl -T2 prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, or permanent seed implantation. Radiother Oncol, 2004, 71 : 29-33.
  • 7Nag S, Beyer D, Friedland J, et al. American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of Prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1999, 44: 789-799.
  • 8Zelefsky M J, Wallner KE, Ling CC, et al. Comparison of the 5year outcome and morbidity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus transperineal permanent iodine-125 implantation for early-stage prostatic cancer. J Clin Oncol, 1999, 17: 517-522.
  • 9Block T, Czempiel H, Zimmermann F. Transperineal permanent seed implantation of "low-risk" prostate cancer: 5-year experiences in 118 patients. Strahlenther Onkol, 2006, 182: 666-671.
  • 10Zelefsky M J, Yamada Y. Five-year outcome of intraperative conformal permanent 1-125 interstitial implantation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007, 67 : 65-70.

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部