摘要
相对优势地位是一种交易中的优势,不能单靠反垄断法来规制,必须强调合同法的配合。反垄断法规制相对优势地位必须遵循一定的限度,尤其强调滥用行为的消极后果必须超出交易双方之间,对相关市场竞争造成限制或损害了消费者利益。我国现行法律对相对优势地位的规制比较零散,《反垄断法》仅将其作为判断某一企业是否构成"市场支配地位"的因素之一,并未规制相对优势地位本身。
Whether the antimonopoly law regulates the comparatively dominant position depends on whether the position would restrict competition. The comparatively dominance is a dominance in a transaction. Therefore, it can not be regulated rely solely on antimonopoly law; contract law must be stressed for coordination. The antimonopoly law's regulation to the comparatively dominant position must follow a certain limit, with particular emphasis on the negative consequences that the abuse of the position must go beyond the parties in transaction, and restrict competition in the relevant market or cause damage to the interests of consumers. China's existing legal provisions about the comparatively dominant position are relatively fragmented. China's "Antimonopoly Law" only regards the comparatively dominant position as one of the factors to judge " dominant position", and does not regulate the position itself.
出处
《时代法学》
2008年第3期74-79,共6页
Presentday Law Science
关键词
反垄断法
相对优势地位
规制基础
规制限度
antimonopoly law
the comparatively dominant position
regulation foundation
regulation limits