摘要
20世纪西方法理学经历了从法律确定性向法律不确定性的转向,以"唯一正确答案"为核心的法律确定性难以成立。然而,这并不会影响法律确定性所追求的限制权力这一政治目标的实现,恰当阐释的法律客观性观念可以作为法治的基石。共同的社会文化背景、适当的法律推理思维方法、成熟的法律职业共同体三者的共同作用将为法律推理的客观性的实现提供保障。
In 20 century western jurisprudence has witnessed the turn from the conception of legal determinacy to that of legal indeterminacy, legal determinacy based on “the only fight answer” thesis has been proved to be unreasonable. The turn of conception, however, doesn＇ t influence the realization of the goal of limiting the political power of the state. The objectivity of law can become the foundation of the rule of law. Common background of social culture,fight method of legal reasoning, and legal professional community will warrant the objectivity of legal reasoning.
出处
《政法论丛》
2008年第3期72-75,共4页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
法律推理
客观性
确定性
不确定性
legal reasoning
objectivity
determinacy
indeterminacy
