政府科技资助对企业R&D产出的影响——基于我国大中型工业企业的实证研究被引量：66

Effect of government science and technology subsidies on enterprise R&D output——an empirical analysis based on the large and medium-sized industry enterprise of our country

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文基于文献研究,构建了企业R&D投入产出的计量模型,采用我国大中型工业企业的相关数据,测度了政府科技资助、企业自筹R&D资金、金融机构贷款等对企业R&D产出的影响。进一步,分别考察了政府资助强度、企业技术特征对政府科技资助与企业R&D产出绩效关系的影响。研究发现:政府科技资助对企业的R&D产出有明显的促进作用,但是作用不及企业自筹的R&D资金;政府科技资助对中等资助强度产业的R&D产出有着明显的促进作用;政府科技资助对低、中低技术产业的R&D产出有着明显的促进作用,金融机构贷款对企业R&D产出的作用不显著。 Based on literature review, the paper sets up an econometric model of enterprise R＆D in - out,then by using the panel data of large and medium industry, gives the empirical analysis on the relation of government subsidies, enterprise self- financed R＆D investment, bank loans and enterprise R＆D output. The main empirical findings are following： government subsidies have incentives on enterprise R＆D output, but the effect of government subsidies is lower than enterprise self - financed R＆D investment; government subsidies have significant effects on enterprise R＆D output for middle level industries of the subsidies intensity; government subsidies have incentives on enterprise R＆D output to the lower - technology industries ; bank loans have not significant effect on enterprise R＆D output.

作者程华赵祥

机构地区浙江理工大学经济管理学院

出处《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第3期519-525,共7页 Studies in Science of Science

基金国家自然基金(70573098) 浙江省科技厅重点项目(2006C25006) 浙江省科技计划项目(2007C25029)

关键词政府科技资助企业R&D产出实证研究资助强度技术特征 government science and technology subsidies enterprise R＆D output empirical analysis intensity of subsidies technology characteristic

分类号 G30 [文化科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献19

1Arrow K. The economic implication of learning by doing[A]. Review of Economic Studies, 1962,29 ( 2 ) : [55 - 173.
2OECD,研究与发展调查手册(第5版),弗拉斯卡蒂丛书[M].科技部发展计划司,中国科技指标研究会主编.北京:新华出版社,2000.
3Terleckyj N. Effects of R&D on the Productivity Growth of Industries : An Exploratory Study [ C ]. National Planning Association, Washington, DC, 1974.
4Griliches Z, Lichtenberg F. Inter - industry technology flows and productivity growth: a reexamination [ J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1984, 66 : 324 - 329.
5Lichtenberg, F R, Siegel D. The input of R&D investment on productivity: new evidence using linked R&D - LRD data[ J ]. Economic Inquiry, 1989, (29) : 203 - 229.
6Bartelsman E J. R&D Spending and Manufacturing Productivity: An Empirical Analysis [ C ]. Working Paper, Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Govemors of the Federal Reserve System, January, 1990.
7Levy D M, Terleckyj N E. Effects of government R&D on private R&D investment and productivity: a macroeconomics analysis[ J ]. The Bell Journal of Economics 14, Autumn, 1983.
8Griliches, Zvi. Productivity,R&D, and basic research at the firm level in the 1970's [ J]. American Economic Review, 1986,76:142 - 154.
9Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth[ J ]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1979,10( 1 ) :92 - 116.
10Hu A G. Ownership, private R&D, government R&D, and productivity in Chinese industry [ J ]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2001 , (29) : 136 - 157.

二级参考文献22

1Dehua Ju. China's budding software industry [J]. IEEE Software, May - June 2001 : 92 -95.
2Howard Rubin, Margaret Johnson, and Susan Iventosch. The US software industry [ J ]. IEEE Software, Jan. -Feb.2002 : 95 - 97.
3J. Robins and M. F. Wiersema. A resource- based approach to the multibusiness firm: empirical analysis of the portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance [ J 1.Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 16:277-299.
4Ashish Arora, V. S. Arunachalam, Jai Asundi, and Ronald Fernandes. The Indian software services industry [ J ]. Research Policy, 2001, 30: 1267-1287.
5Deependra Moitra. Indiag software industry [ J]. IEEE Software, Jan. - Feb. 2001 : 77 - 80.
6P. D. Chatzoglou and N. Vafeas. The financial profile of the software industry between 1980 and 1994 [ Jl. Information and Software Technology, 2000, 42:755 -763.
7R. Hoskisson, R. A. Johnson, and D. D. Moesel. Corporate divesture intensity in restructuring firms: effects of governance, strategy, and performance [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37:1207-1251.
8R. Schmalensee. Inter - industry studies of structure and performance. In R. Schmalensee and R. Willig ( Eds. ),Handbook of industrial organization: vol. 2, 1989, (pp.951 - 1011). Amsterdam: North Holland.
9Subroto Bagehi. India's software industry: the people dimension [J].IEEE Software, May-June 1999:62 -65.
10刘小玄.竞争市场上的国有企业行为——关于微利企业的案例研究报告[J].管理世界,1998(1):176-185. 被引量：6