期刊文献+

近场声全息正则化方法比较 被引量:4

Comparison of Regularization Methods of Nearfield Acoustic Holography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了正确选择正则化方法,在基于边界元方法的近场声全息理论基础上,分析了截断奇异值法和Tikhonov正则化方法的异同点,阐述了通过曲率求解L曲线拐角点的基本原理,并将L曲线准则和广义交叉检验法应用于截断奇异值正则化方法最优截断点的选取.通过数值仿真表明,利用L曲线最大曲率点可以有效地确定L曲线最优正则化参数位置;在基于边界元法的共形平面近场声全息中,当信噪比为60 dB时,4种组合正则化方法在1 000 Hz频率点处分辨距离能达到42 mm.最后,比较研究了4种组合正则化方法的重构精度和稳健性. The selection of regularization methods is the key issue on the boundary element method ( BEM )-based nearfield acoustic holography ( NAH ). The characteristics of the truncated singular value decomposition ( TSVD ) method and standard Tikhonov regularization method were discussed respectively. The L-curve criterion and the generalized cross validation ( GCV ) method were both employed to attain the optimal regularization parameters for Tikhonov and TSVD regularization method. Furthermore, the maximum curvature of L-curve is used to determine the regularization parameter of the L-curve criterion. A numerical simulation of a speaker is taken as an example. The numerical results demonstrate the validity of the maximum curvature of L-curve applied in L-curve criterion. It can also be concluded that a signal noise ratio ( SNR ) of about 60 dB would lead to the resolution distance of 42 mm at the frequency of 1 000 Hz. Finally, the accuracy and limitation of four combined regularization methods are investigated.
出处 《天津大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期696-702,共7页 Journal of Tianjin University(Science and Technology)
关键词 近场声全息 正则化疗法 边界元方法 截断奇异值法 Tikhonov法 L曲线准则 广义交义检验法 nearfield acoustic holography regularization method boundary element method truncated singular value decomposition method Tikhonovmethod L-curvecriterion generalized cross validation method
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Williams E G, Houston B H, Herdic P C. Fast Fourier transform and singular value decomposition formulations for patch near-field acoustical holography [ J ]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2003, 114 ( 3 ) : 1322- 1333.
  • 2Hald J. Combined NAH and beamforming using the same microphone array [ J ]. Sound and Vibration, 2004,38 (12) : 18-27.
  • 3Valdivia N, Williams E G. Implicit methods of solution to integral formulations in boundary element based nearfield acoustic holography [ J ]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2004, 116 (3) : 1559-1572.
  • 4Schuhmacher A,Hald J, Rasmussen K B,et al. Sound source reconstruction using inverse boundary element calculations [ J ]. J Acoust Soc Am, 2003,113 ( 1 ) : 114-127.
  • 5Ko B, Lee S Y. Enhancing the reconstruction of acoustic source field using wavelet transformation [ J ]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2005,19 ( 8 ) : 1611- 1620.
  • 6Zhao X,Wu S F. Reconstruction of vibro-acoustic fields using hybrid nearfield acoustic holography [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2005,282 ( 3/4/5 ) : 1183-1199.
  • 7Nolte B. Reconstruction of sound sources by means of an inverse boundary element formulation [J]. Journal of Computation Acoustics, 2005,13 ( 1 ) : 187-201.
  • 8Moondra M S, Wu S E Visualization of vehicle interior sound field using nearfield acousticial holography based on the Helmholtz-Equation Least-Squares (HELS) method [J]. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 2005, 53 (4) : 145-154.
  • 9Hansen P C. Truncated singular value decomposition solutions to discrete ill-posed problems with ill-determined numerical rank [J]. SLAM, 1990, 11 (3) :503-518.
  • 10Bai M R, Lin H H. Source identification system based on the time-domain nearfield equivalence source imaging. Fundamental theory and implementation [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2007,307 ( 1/2 ):202-225.

同被引文献19

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部